Bruce Freeman Rail Trail Dominates Town Warrant Closure

With five of the eight citizen petition warrant articles relating to the Bruce Freeman Rail Trail, numerous issues were discussed in a packed and tense Board of Selectmen meeting on Tuesday night.

The 2012 Westford Town Meeting Warrant is now closed, but the debate over the future of the neighborhoods around the Bruce Freeman Rail Trail is still very much open.

Before a packed audience that filled the Town Hall Conference Room and at times stretched down the hall, the Westford Board of Selectmen unanimously approved all 41 articles to appear on the warrant during their Tuesday night meeting, debate ensued after whether a pair of placeholder articles related to the Bruce Freeman Rail Trail should be removed.

This debate arose due to a pair of warrant articled petitioned by local residents with nearly identical language, bringing the question if they were still needed.

Those who favored keeping the articles cited that Selectmen presenting the articles to Town Meeting gave a weight that citizen petitions could not provide, and that the Selectmen had more resources to prepare a better argument to the voters.

Meanwhile, the case for removing the placeholder articles, #18 and #38, were buoyed by the fact that they were redundant and the citizen petitioned articles could not be removed from the warrant.

Also, there were concerns from Selectman Valerie Wormell, a resident of the area, that dragging out the issue into the public spotlight without creating a consensus on how to move forward might create bad blood between neighbors near the trail.

“Believe me, you’re pitting neighbor against neighbor, you pick one number (address), you go up two and you have someone that feels the exact opposite. What’s going to happen is that Town Meeting is going to be a boxing ring.”” said Wormell.  “Unless there is resolution before Town Meeting, somebody is going to win and somebody is going to lose, and those neighborhoods will be extremely uncomfortable to live in for the next decade.”

Although discussion on each article, as well as votes their recommendation, will be held during future meetings before the Mar. 24 Town Meeting, the tense atmosphere continued as a legal issue relating to the Bruce Freeman area came to the forefront.

The legal issue was brought to the town following a dispute on Landmark Drive involving the Westford Conservation Trust, neighbors in the area, and access to land separating Landmark and Elderberry Way, only feet away from the Rail Trail.

While it is unclear whether the town is a party to the dispute, that ambiguity as to whether or not this involves the town and the amount of correspondence related to the incident necessitated public disclosure and continued research from legal counsel to discover the truth for the sake of transparency according to Westford town land planner Angus Jennings.

William Leonard, an attorney for a pair of families on Landmark and a Westford resident, told the board that continued research from town legal counsel would create the adversarial atmosphere that Wormell feared and could potentially end in litigation against the town, an argument that echoed by other neighborhood residents who said the crux of the dispute was not about the land, but the Bruce Freeman Rail Trail issue.

Ultimately, Selectman Robert Jefferies found this preposterous.

“A citizen said that there are illegal acts being committed by the town of Westford. As a Selectman, it’s my responsibility to find out what the story is,” he said, noting earlier that he was also involved in a private dispute on his own land with the Trust. “That’s what I’m trying to find out; I’m not trying to address any of those other issues.”

However, the issue of parking along the Bruce Freeman Rail Trail had not received significant attention since at the due to the town’s hopes of using a parking lot in Acton as the solution for the issue, with neighbors also frustrated that this meeting could not be held in the Library again due to overcrowding that had occurred on this night.

This frustration came to a head when a man from the neighborhood near the trail officially identified for the record as Paul Marrkand asked the board to prioritize the issue’s importance on a range spanning from the Westford Public School budget to the U.S federal deficit, eventually berating the board to the point where Chairwoman Andrea Peraner-Sweet ordered him to stop.

Marrkand refused to talk with Westford Patch on the issue.

The agenda item ended with a motion to have a special meeting on various aspects of the subject sometime after town legal counsel was expected to return with a decision on the Landmark issue on Feb. 7 and before Feb. 29.

Andrew Sylvia January 26, 2012 at 10:27 PM
Thanks D.B! Just wanted to clarify.
UC February 24, 2012 at 12:31 AM
I was at the August meeting in the library. I also remember remarks made by then chairman Jefferies that made me infuriated. He made it sound like he was the "decider" for the town. We know that is not actually true, but to even come across that way is wrong. I know I will not vote for him if he runs for re-election. For the record, I live in the neighborhood we are talking about, and for me, the issue is about changing a purely residential stretch of 27 into rezoned areas that could lead to more commercialization which is not what we signed on for. Love the trail, but the BFRT should have included parking plans in its planning AND implementation. Now it is too late, especially as we were never meant to be a long term terminus of the trail.
Sam February 24, 2012 at 01:36 AM
Take a look at Commell drive. Because of the FPCU, Farmers Market and PCA and their business operations which run on residential lots our street has been made into a parking lot. Connell drive is completely surrounded by residential lots and it is now a parking lot which is abused on a nightly basis. We in this neighborhood know first hand what it is like when the Town and the powers that be disregard zoning and cater to their special interests. We will be there voting with you.
UC February 24, 2012 at 06:17 PM
Tom Many thanks for the support- please make sure your friends and neighbors in town also join you! We greatly appreciate it!
Sam February 24, 2012 at 07:02 PM
Not a problem. Poor planning and ignoring zoning restrictions by elected officials should not be a residential neighborhoods problem. Unfortunately if it isn't in your backyard most people don't see it as an issue.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »