Having participated in more than my fair share of conference calls for client meetings, I am unsure of this policy. A lot can be garnered from being in the room not just in terms of seeing any visuals (such as maps or other documents) but from reading body language and facial expressions. I suppose as long as it does not become a regular habit by members, it could work to ensure full board participation.

Like most things, I think remote participation is just fine, in moderation.

It allows government meetings to proceed on schedule, with full participation, voting, etc. However, remote participation is not as effective on a long-term basis, so I feel there should be restrictions in place for how and when remote participation is allowed. No problem if it's only once in a while... a few times per year. I think more regular remote participation should not be allowed (with the exception of special circumstances -- such as illness, injury, etc.)

While I agree with others' comments that remote participation should be done in moderation, I believe it is a necessity for our town to not only allow our town employees flexibility, but to be able to have active resident participants on these boards and committees. Many residents are familiar with remote participation, and our focus on recruiting high tech firms to Westford will increase this way of business. With the amount and maturity of (often free) tools available, the nuances of an in-person meeting are becoming less critical to get the full experience (with the exception of chocolate covered pretzels of course!).

Remote participation will never be as good as in-person, but to be able to engage our active residents and keep regular meeting schedules so business moves forward, I feel it will be key.