patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Westford's Teachers Aim To Get Town's Attention Outside Schools

Westford teachers hope that a series of visibility actions outside Westford's public schools before and after the regular school day this week will sway residents to their side.

 

Following the recent negotiating impasse that ended the current round of mediation between the Westford Education Association and the Westford School Committee, WEA members began taking to the street corners outside schools to once again aim at garnering support at their cause.

The visibility began on Monday, with teachers from the Nabnasset, Miller and Robinson Schools outside carrying banners and wearing the bright green t-shirts of the union before and after the school day, with teachers from Westford’s other public schools standing outside on Monday morning.

Monday’s efforts will be duplicated, with the t-shirts and banners shifting on Tuesday to the Abbot, Day and Crisafulli Schools, Wednesday to the Stony Brook and Blanchard Schools and on Thursday to Westford Academy at times that will not conflict with their obligations in the classroom.

According to WEA officials, the teachers’ early arrival has continued for the safety of their students, despite the union’s “work-to-rule” action, where all voluntary work-related activities are prohibited.

Teachers such as WEA negotiating team leader Mary McCusker say they are aiming to do those voluntary actions, such as writing college recommendations for students, during work hours to avoid shortchanging their students while not violating the work-to-rule decision.

While town officials have noted that the town’s other unions have come to agreements, McCusker believes that such comparisons are unfair.

“Other unions only have five steps, we have 14 steps. It’s apples and oranges, it’s not the same,” she said. “And it’s only a reopening clause, it doesn’t mean that (the town) has to pay the other unions because they have a reopening clause allowing them to renegotiate their contracts.”

Negotiations are set to restart on Wednesday, with WEA members hoping to reach an agreement they can live with while satisfying the needs of negotiators on the other side.

“We’ve always been more than willing to try and work within the financial restraints (the town) says they are working under,” said negotiating team member and Nabnasset special needs teacher Lisa Navarro. “We have yet to get any clarifying statements from them regarding our non-budgetary offers, they simply say they will not discuss, no, no, no. We haven’t heard any reasoning why.”

Currently both sides have come to agreement on 11 of the 22 items currently under negotiation, although neither side has elaborated further over details of what those items are, with McCusker only noting that they are fairly non-controversial topics.

Following a question during Monday night's School Committee meeting, School Committee chairwoman Angela Harkness indicated that mediations ended at the request of the mediator after their belief that no further progress could be made during that mediation.

Harkness also indicated that the main piece of contention was compensation, although no further information could be provided due to an agreement between both sides prior the beginning of the contract process that negotiations would be private.

However, on that note, School Committee member David Keele said he would make a motion to publicize details of negotiations to the public if progress was not made from Wednesday's meeting.

In addition to mediation, Wednesday will also hold a hearing in regard to the union's unfair labor practices claim against the town. If that claim continues, according to Harkness on Monday night, the process could continue until January 2013.

Contact information is available for members of the public wishing to ask questions to those on either side on the Westford Education Association and Westford Public School websites.

Related Topics: Westford Education Association and Westford School Committee

Baboo Joe

6:22 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

From what I understand the town is likely to loose in court anyway so why not pay the steps and nothing else? If we loose in court its logical the teachers are going to then increase their demands as they will no longer need to negotiate for the steps...I think this School Committee negotiating team is leading the town and the wonderful schools right off the end of a cliff!

Reply

Shelly Newark

7:19 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Hard to comment without knowing the details of the hold-outs. Perhaps Keele is onto something--publicizing the details. I could more appropriately support the teachers if I knew what I was fighting for. Our two years in town schools have been great. We love our teachers and want Westford to continue with their superior education system. Let's get this done!

Reply

Cynthia

9:07 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Yes, publicize the details. How can anyone support an agenda they know nothing or very little about. It is difficult to support any increase compensation. Since 2008 many local businesses have had a 15-30% decrease in revenues. Those empolyeed have stayed at the same salary or have taken a cut in pay or are working more hours without compensation. The depression/recession is still alive.

Reply

Molly

9:53 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Too bad teachers do not respect where their paychecks come from ( the TAXPAYERS) . I wish I could fire them all since they do not appreciate and respect where their paycheck comes from. Never mind if they win at the labor board they are just sending their co-workers away without a job. But remember you all stand UNITED. Keep holding those signs up. What a joke! There are soooo many new, young college grads that would be pretty appreciative to be teaching in Westford or any other town for that matter. I bet all those teachers would be easy to replace...

Reply

Kathleen Spaeth

9:57 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

I am uncomfortable with the possible motion that these Contract Negotiations would not be private. But on the other hand, I am curious to know what all the 22 items are and why both sides have only agreed on 11 out of the 22 items. The WEA representative, McCusker, says that they are "fairly non-controversial topics", but if that is the case than why haven't they been settled on?

Also why does the School Committee have to give "clarifying statements" regarding the "non-budgetary offers"? I know that it is hard to hear the words: "no, no, no", but it is a word not used enough now adays and there doesn't have to be any reasoning behind it (unless of course you plan on arguing and countering the responses of "no, no, no" and then pitching a fit?)

Why does the WEA have 14 Steps? Couldn't we negotiate these Steps down to 5 Steps (like all the other Unions) and save money and make the Contract Negotiations simpler? Then we would need to have a Mediator get involved either!

Finally, the "reopening clause" shouldn't be invoked and should be left along (its the third rail and we don't want to touch it)!

Reply

Pellegrino Westford

11:31 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

I believe Jodi Ross and Mr. Olson each received increase in pay. So Its difficult when the Chiefs are getting their wallets padded when the Indians, school teachers, are asked to take a nada, 0 % raise. The teachers are on the front lines everyday with the children and why the school system is highly rated. The contract with other town unions to take 1 year no-pay with an out clause is a gamble since the hope all 5 unions would agree. Unfortunatley for Harkness/Ross/Olson the teachers have not gone along and subsequently antagonizing them(teachers). Now the school committee is taking another gamble and go in front of the Mass Labor Board and plead their case why they have been negotiating in good faith. Good Luck on that one. Its time for the Westford citizens to vote on the contract. Keele & Harkness need to step aside.
Bob Pellegrino
65 Russell's Way

Reply
Comment_arrow

Baboo Joe

3:49 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Thank you Bob, I couldnt agree with you more. I used to think Bill Olsen had a firm handle on things in our schools but it becomes more and more clear that this really isnt the case and I wonder if he is a puppet of Harkness and Ross who is powerless to stand up as he is looking 'weathered' this year.
Our town should have never included that reopen clause in ANY contract as it boxed us into a corner as we negotiate with our teachers. I think maybe its time for a chage in leadership around here!!!

Comment_arrow

Paul

12:01 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

It would be nice if you had the correct information. Ross received no such increase you mention. Get the facts before posting please.

Christine Flood

11:54 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

I have two children in the school system. I'd love to learn the details of the negotiation, but failing that I have to say that I think teachers in general are underpaid for the work they do, and the teachers in Westford deserve whatever they are asking for. I'd be willing to pay more in taxes to support our outstanding schools.

Christine Flood
13 Main Street

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan D.

4:22 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

"whatever they are asking for"? Seriously? Open checkbook for all of them, the good and the bad?

Comment_arrow

Paul

12:04 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Glad to hear you are in a position to fund whatever the teachers are asking for. Sadly, the majority of residents are not able to. Look around. Wages for residents are not going up. Expenses are.

Comment_arrow

June Mary

1:45 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Are you volunteering to pay for the retirees who depend on social security who did not receive COLAs in 2010 & 2011 although Medicare Part B premiums were increased.
The Feds used two different COLA indexes to justify their actions.
Back at the ranch, if you look at the teaching contract of the WEA for FY2010 and FY2011, no teacher received less than an automatic 6+% adjustment and some teachers received as much as 17% increase in wages.

Dan D.

4:21 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Once, again, I'd like to see real numbers, not emotional outbursts about the nice teachers "deserving" more. How about the teacher/student ratio compared to the BoS goal, the average number of applicants per teacher opening in Westford, ratio of non teaching staff to real teaching staff and teacher attrition rate compared to other towns. Let's not lobby to toss money at a problem that may not exist!

I agree new teachers do not get paid enough for the work that they do. I've witnessed it myself. But I would argue that they should not be entitled to automatic raises just because they are alive. Merit, fine. Automatic, NO!

But, all that is not the point. The point is there is no money to spend on automatic raises, and every other union recognizes that fact. If you have a problem with Mr. Olsen's raise or Ms Ross' raise, bring it up to the BoS and school committee but it ain't gonna affect teachers step raises.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christine Flood

6:27 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

"Let's not lobby to toss money at a problem that may not exist?" The teachers have been without a contract for over a year, and have taken to the streets to get support. I'd say that's pretty strong evidence that there is a problem.

Comment_arrow

Dan D.

7:43 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

So they don't have a contract. That may be a problem for some of the teachers, but not for the town or the kids or the school system. The teachers get paid. They get their benefits. They get a great town to work in with students that have families that care, that put an emphasis on education and that show up. So, make the trade off and leave for someplace better or be satisfied with what you've got.
Again, where are the measurements that show the town/taxpayer/students have a problem?
An analogy: A factory finds itself in a financial position that precludes spending any money on raises or increased benefits. Competition is fierce and there is no more debt or equity to be had. Nobody's happy about not getting a raise, but their customers (students, parents,rating systems) really are satisfied, customer satisfaction is great, and the workers stay their for many reasons, good place to work, still getting paid, nice bennies, inertia, etc. The workers can organize, complain, try to bargain,but there is no $$ to be had. Sooooo, since the competitive landscape is not going to get any better what do you do? do a crappy job "to get even"? Not good, as you'll get canned in a heartbeat. Answer: find any unnecessary headcount and either lay them off or don't replace due to transition, find better ways to run the place with less people and share some of the proceeds in form of raises or bonuses.

Full Monty

6:18 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

The same School Committee that exercised the 'option' in Bill Olsen's contract to award $2,000 bonus is the same one that cries 'Broke, No Money' when it negotiates with its teachers. Take it up with them? No, I dont think so. we need to clean house starting with the chair. The schools are a MESS right now and I blame 'top leadership'.

Reply

Dan D.

6:28 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

How are they a mess? Can't attract good teachers? Can't keep the best ones?
Are the teachers letting their contract issues interfere with the kids educational experience?
By the way, $2K won't make a difference in the budget, will it? Did he make or exceed all of his measurements?
Let's have some facts, not broad, meaningless statements.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Julie C.

10:03 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Yes, the teachers are letting their contract issues interfere with the kids' educational experience. Just ask any 8th grader who was looking forward to the Washington D.C. trip. The teachers have not yet said if they will be chaperoning, obviously due to the contract issue. But the teachers did not have a signed contract when they presented the trip to the students and parents last fall. Rather disingenuous if you ask me.

Comment_arrow

Molly

10:44 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

@Julie, not missing much with the trip. I have had kids who went and an 8th grader that did not get to go because they did not offer the trip at the time. Alot of money for a rushed 2 days and why pay for teachers to recieve a free trip.

Comment_arrow

Hartley

1:56 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Dear Julie and Molly:

As a former teacher that has taken many kids on trips....yes, teachers do go "free"but you have to remember it is a 24/7 job. Try taking 300 kids through the airport, keeping them safe in the hotel, working from 7am - 12am everyday with no breaks, not being home with your family, etc. I have always loved doing the "trips" but let me tell you....I came home EXHAUSTED and needed two days to recover. It not a Vacation at all.

Comment_arrow

Julie C.

2:11 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

@ Hartley - I never said it was a vacation for the teachers. I'm saying it reflects poorly on the teachers to deny the kids the experience because of a contract issue, especially when the contract issue existed when the kids signed up for the trip. The teachers knew they didn't have a signed contract but promoted the trip to the kids anyway. I've heard that some kids are now wearing black on Wednesdays to support the teachers simply because they want to go on the trip.

Comment_arrow

AB

4:06 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

You'd be better off flying your kiddo to DC yourself for a long weekend and giving them a chance to really experience it without the distraction of 300 other kids anyway. :) Ever since I was in Jr High, they've been not much more than really expensive airplane rides to hotel sleepovers.

John Washington

6:39 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Both sides need to stop digging their soles into the dirt and truly begin to negotiate !!! That means entering into a mutual and open discussion and compromising to achieve some results. All of this is starting to affect our students in a negative way. Get the job done now or bring in some skilled negotiators to arbitrate. The length of time this is taking and the lack of forward progress is ridiculous....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan D.

7:47 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Does "begin to negotiate" mean "give them raises?" Strip away all the BS and that seems to be what you got. If, as alluded to by some on this forum, there is a secret money tree growing that the BoS is hiding, or there are other issues being misrepresented, fine let's hear them. But, if as all the other unions seem to believe, there is no secret money tree, stop pretending, sign the contract and end this nonsense.

Samantha Stage

7:03 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

I dont feel I can support either side until the facts are presented. There should be a public forum where both sides present their facts and actual numbers. Since the school committee feels they are representing what is best for the town then the town should be able to hear the negotiations for themselves. As for the teachers, they are being very vague about their position so it is hard to know where they are coming from except asking for better raises than any other town employee received. It is time to lay this all on the table for the taxpayers in Westford because at this point it is hard to know what to comment on.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul

12:05 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Ask both sides to negotiate in public. Not sure who has what to hide, but put the meetings on camera. That way we can all see and hear what is being asked for by both sides.

Comment_arrow

Sarah

1:15 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

There is an article on the WA newspaper website that has some information; http://www.waghostwriter.com/2012/02/14/teacher-contract-qa/

Christine Flood

9:22 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

If you look at per capita spending http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/state_report/ppx.aspx and objective test scores http://www.boston.com/news/special/education/mcas/scores11/10th_top_districts.htm you will see that our school system does a very good job with the limited resources it has. Our per capita spending is one of the lowest in the area. We have good people and they work hard. We need to figure out a way to pay them what they deserve.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan D.

7:56 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Find the money tree and harvest.

Patch_comments_icon

Andrew Sylvia

9:38 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

One thing I want to add here to the discussion is that my understanding from the School Committee meeting last night is that there is not animosity between the two sides, just a difference of opinion. Statements were made to that end during the meeting, which is available for viewing on Westford CAT.

That's my interpretation of what I saw, but I wanted to add that here, and I wanted to apologize for not adding that information inside the story.

I am required by my position to remain objective and neutral in this issue, but I wanted to say something here as I also want this discussion to remain as civil as possible, and I wanted to note that if things get too out of control at any point, I'll close discussion.

Reply

H Munster

3:43 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

"understanding from the School Committee meeting last night is that there is not animosity between the two sides, "

REALLY? WOW..............Thats hard to believe from what I have heard but ok then...

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Andrew Sylvia

2:08 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Comments along those lines were said during the meeting on Monday.

H Munster

3:59 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Had the town just been reasonable and said there is not $$$ for a COLA adjustment and offed a couple less days (from PD days) and an extra personal day or two in its place this would be over.
To take away teacher steps which 99% of the time are a 'given' across the Commonwealth of MA and the US (Yes, even in these financial times) is why we are at a stalemate. Teachers ARE understanding about the town's finances BUT taking away steps is just about unheard of in the eduction world (Ask teachers you know in other places). People can talk about no raises in the private sector but one of the unwritten rules of teacher contracts is steps are a given. Give the teachers their steps, be creative about not being able to give a COLA and this ends quickly. 99% of the time steps are honored, Lunenburg recently tried to withhold them and Lunenburg lost in court for not paying steps, Westford will loose too because this is SOP in education which I understand doesnt always equate to practice in the private sector. In 1999 when teachers came back in the fall to no contract steps were paid. The Court will use this to establish past practice (and deem this School Committee broke that here) and thus did NOT negotiate in good faith.
If the town is so shabby financially that it really CANT pay steps, then teachers indefinitely working to rule is just the tip of the iceberg of troubles to come for this town!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

7:33 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

The use of H Munster as a login says a a lot about who you are, what you are and shades everything you write. Are you carrying on a conversation with yourself?

The way I see it (Mr private citizen with 3 children attending the schools):
- no one on the SC or Admin has ever said (or even come close) "the teachers are not worth the $ they are paid", "the teachers have it easy", ...
- the people who manage the tax $s I pay have said: we have CUT in may areas and the schools have been basically been immune, this year we need to save some $, we negotiated with most of the unions and they helped us out, ...
- now we come to the last/biggest/most costly union and they are not willing to HELP, they are set on one thing and nothing is going to keep them from it, ...
- the suggestions of extra PD days, ... is all BS in my eyes, so you should keep that under the covers
- average teacher salaries, steps were paid in the past, ... is also BS in my eyes, the CONTRACT EXPIRED, my neighbors salary, his raises, his debts, ... have no bearing on me

This is all about the biggest union being a bit childish.

Comment_arrow

Dan D.

8:00 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

It's a new day. New era. The days of SOP steps are numbered, not only in Westford.
The public is demanding performance based raises, not SOP "breathing" raises. The times they are a'changin!

H Munster

4:42 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Agreed, this doesnt tell the entire story BUT it is not insignificant or irrelevant and DOES tell part of the story:

How Westford compares

Average teaching salaries based on the total teaching salaries, divided by the number of full-time equivalent teachers. Data is for 2009-10, which is the most recent report available.

WESTFORD $66,231

GROTON-DUNSTABLE $67,255

LITTLETON $71,430

HARVARD $73,964

ACTON- BOXBOROUGH $75,454

ACTON $76,371

BOXBOROUGH $76,520

CONCORD $81,598

Source: 2009-10 teacher salaries report, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION

Our real estate agents use test scores to show we are a comparable district, our Superintendent and Administrators believe we are an 'elite' public school system, I think we are just as good as other DCL schools, it doesnt seem like our teachers asking to stay even in regard to pay is unreasonable.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Julie C.

8:19 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Your averages mean nothing unless we know the ages of those full-time equivalent teachers. A town with a majority of young teachers on lower steps will skew the average downward.

Comment_arrow

Paul

12:07 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

One of the most irrelevant data points used by the union. What is the average tenure of teachers in each town? Without that information this is rather meaningless. Take a look at the salary ranges by each town. It may show the same results, but much more telling of how each Town compares to one another.

Comment_arrow

AB

4:46 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

I agree with Paul and Julie. The "market basket" approach doesn't work when you aren't comparing apples to apples. If Westford has more Step 1-5 FTEs and other districts are averaging those with steps 5-8, of course their numbers will be higher. It's a crucial missing link in your calculation.

Comment_arrow

Don Willis

4:54 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

I used to think maybe we were really skewed by more younger teachers so I looked at a set point on each of those contracts (I think it was 10 years with a Master's Degree) and Westford was SIGNIFICANTLY (often to the tune of $7,000-$9,000) behind all those districts.....we have just been more thrifty (yes, perhaps cheap) then our neighbors. I think this is a good thing but we are now going to fall behind to the point I believe good teachers who have the chance to go elsewhere will and new college grads with a job offer in westford and another town are much less likely to pick Westford now as we have a new reputation as the town that cant even honor steps and pays thousands less,
I imagine the Disney Trip (why this is an appropriate educational trip for an 18 year old has always been beyond me!) is also hanging in the balance?

Comment_arrow

June Mary

1:58 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

H Munster being a highly educated and intelligent individual, you must be aware that the average salaries have to do mostly with the number of years (steps) than actual compensation levels. If all the teachers in Westford were at M+30 with 14 years of experience the average salary for Westford would be in excess of $78,000/year for 185 six hours of teaching or about $78/hr. . If all the teachers in Westford were at B-1 then the average salary would be around $41,000 or around $41/hr.
You and the rest of great intellects that compose the WEA membership always have the right to go find employment in any of the communities that you listed. If you really want the big bucks teach in Boston.

Sam

8:24 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

You are working in Westford, not Acton and not Concord. Can we please stop comparing what is happening in other towns. Each town is completely unique. If engineers at HP get paid more than engineers at Red Hat, it is quite simple, the engineers have a choice. If during his or her negotiations, the Red Hat engineer brings up the fact that engineers at HP make more guess what you will most likely get? (see finger pointed at door). Lets deal with what is happening in Westford. Vincent's assement is right on.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christine Flood

8:42 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

In my experience that just isn't true. Keeping salaries commensurate with the rest of the industry is necessary for attracting and keeping the best engineers or the best teachers.

Christine Flood
software engineer and mom

Comment_arrow

AB

4:53 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

It is true. Teachers consider the town when applying. They know teaching in Dracut or Fall River is a whole different ballgame than teaching in Acton or Westford. And we have no concrete proof that salaries are not commensurate without a side-by-side analysis of property taxes, user fees, and step increases of each town you are comparing.

Also - with no metric to measure such things, how do you know which teachers are the "best"? Nothing in the contract that I know of is merit-based (please correct me if I am wrong), nor do contractually obligated pay raises have anything to do with performance.

Comment_arrow

Pete Marivich

5:23 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Whats happening in Westford is the Town/school committee is violating state law in how it has negotiated with its teachers in withholding Steps. Its just a matter of a week or so before this is 100% clear to all in town when the MA Labor Board rules this to be the case. ILLEGAL actions will be what people remember and this will end up costing the town more.

Sam

8:26 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Sorry "assessment" for the spell check police.

Reply

Pellegrino Westford

9:01 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Folks check this out in Lowell Sun. Description of steps and COLA.

http://www.lowellsun.com/letters/ci_19968813
Bob Pellegrino

Reply
Comment_arrow

Julie C.

9:21 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

So according to the article, the WEA is holding out for step increases for the "new" teachers. If the WEA prevails in the unfair labor practice claim, then some of the new teachers might very well get laid off in order to pay for the step increases of their colleagues. Personally, in this eceonomy, I'd rather have my job at my current pay.

Comment_arrow

Molly

10:35 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

According to the article there should be retired teachers as well to help off set this up and down escalator. How many teachers retired????? So the newbies could get there steps.....The teachers have to remember that they lost alot of respect in the community over this. Taxpayers have done their part. When it was time to pay buses, we did because we wanted to keep our great school system, sport fees, had to so we can pay those spanish teachers or whatever teachers were at risk of losing their job at the time..... This is a time the teachers could have taken one for the team. We have provided them an amazing and in comparison to alot of places an easy place to teach. Try earning your teacher pay in Lowell and Lawrence. Now they are UNDERPAID teachers for what they have to deal with there.
@Christine maybe you are made of money and if your wallet is soo open then maybe you can pay out of your pocket a great donation to the town to save your soooo poorly paid teachers. There alot of people who just can't pay anymore. Get in reality, there are people really struggling. I know we for one are cutting back on things and the things my kids used to get is a big NO now. Time to watch the pennies!!! I am thankful for my School Committee that they did their best for OUR town..

Sam

9:01 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

I would assume that when a teacher leaves Westford, the adminsitration has a hard time shifting through at least 200-300 resumes for the job opening. Being with 10-12% is not this outrageous difference. I also assuming that based on our current pay scale that we have been behind these towns for a while now. So over the last 20 years have we been filling these postions with inferior teachers?

Reply

Pellegrino Westford

9:33 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

As I pointed out yesterday. The town manager and the superintendent each got generous contract renewals (per newspapers) when their contract were up.

Last town meeting the town authorized $570k for an elevator for the Abbot school.
I asked if other options were investigated that were cost effective.
Answer was no(keele from WSC). No one blinked when monies were approved.
Olsen found $70k to cover the difference since only $500k was allocated.
The job could have been done for less than $100k.

My point is if the town has $570k for an elevator than they surely have the money
to pay steps. Not counting the fact the Chiefs are sitting pretty on their last contract. Yet they keep hammering the teachers who are on the front lines
everyday with the children.
Its time the Westford citizens vote on the contract.

Bob

Reply
Comment_arrow

Pellegrino Westford

10:24 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Remember whats preventing the town & WTC to pay the steps is previously negotiated union contracts which have an out clause that allow them to be re-negotiated.
If the town and WTC give in to the teachers then they will have to deal with other unions as well.

Comment_arrow

Paul

12:09 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Again, wrong on the generous contract renewal for Ross. I believe the contract is online. Read it instead of referring to newspaper articles.

Comment_arrow

AB

5:04 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Town Meeting spending is a joke and has no bearing on the ability of the rest of the town to fund salaries and benefits via taxes. If you voted for the prom king and queen you sort of got what you paid for on the SC and maybe next time everyone will vote a little differently.

Personally, I think we should introduce a measure that any single expenditure over $200k should be voted on at the ballot box, not by less than 10% of the town up at Abbot. That elevator was not a necessity and with prevailing wage laws, everyone who voted should have known it would be an overpriced nightmare.

Sam

9:41 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Totally agree on that one! The elevator was a waste of money during these tight times.

Reply

JS

1:10 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

"A spokeswoman for the Massachusetts Teachers Association reported that teachers in 65 school districts around the state are working under the terms of a previous contract. Sixteen of those contract negotiations have dragged on for a year or more, she said." Cape Cod Times Feb. 14, 2012
Sandwich is one of these districts, hasn't had a contract for over 500 days. Littleton, Andover, Peabody, Watertown are just some of the towns without new teacher contracts successfully completed.
All these school committees bad? All the Superintendents terrible administrators? My point is that can't be the 100% true, some of them must be competent. The common thread is all towns have the same issue lack of budget dollars. Would I like to see all the town employees get raises, sure. Unfortunately as in all enterprises there is only so much cash to go around. This isn’t an issue of whether or not the teachers, police or fire depts. deserve a raise or not is comes down to how much money is in the pot. Just as we all manage own finances and at times do without what we would like, the town is in the same position with its financial resources.

Reply

Joe P

1:33 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Westford is probably the ONLY one though where STEPS were not honored

Reply
Comment_arrow

JS

1:37 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Is this your "guess" or do you know this as a fact?

Comment_arrow

Randy Winslow

4:19 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Fact, look it up or ask any of the teachers from those districts, or call their district offices. Don't be lazy JS.

Julie C.

1:40 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

I have an idea. Since the teachers are walking into school and leaving school at the same time as the kids, why not have them punch timecards to record the actual hours they spend on the job and pay them the hourly equivalent of their step increase?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don Willis

5:36 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

And like Lawyers you are going to pay the hourly rate for ALL the work done right? Not just the in front of the court/class work? Or are you ok with teachers starting to walk in and 'wing it' everyday since you are having them punch a clock?

Comment_arrow

Julie C.

8:16 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

No, my point is that teachers are limiting their work hours to what they can do during a normal "school day". They are making this choice. This is more representative of people who are paid to work hourly. If the teachers are going to behave this way, they should get paid this way.

Comment_arrow

Randy Winslow

4:20 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Julie C. is very angry that she did not become a teacher. Envy is one of the seven deadly sins.

Comment_arrow

Julie C.

4:29 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Actually I wanted to be a teacher. But back in my day, teachers were getting pink-slipped left and right because of the downward trend in births. A teaching job was very hard to come by. But I'm not angry that I didn't become a teacher. I'm happy in my profession.

Don Willis

4:44 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

How long before MCAS scores plummet and teachers are paid Ayer like salaries and Westford's test scores are also Ayer like? Maybe not that long. I dont think its so much that we have lost teachers in the PAST but rather I do think we are going to loose the 'master teachers' in the FUTURE. Has anyone seen the film Moneyball? We are on the fast track of becoming the Oakland As of public schools because we will not have the $$$ to compete with our neighbors and YES we are competing for a pool of teachers and like MLB teams will will fill our roster, there will be live teacher bodies in the classrooms regardless but will it be the talented 'cream of the crop' of the retreads? Think about it, I know I am a concerned resident

Reply
Comment_arrow

Julie C.

8:55 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I'd like to know how you identify the "master teachers" and the talented "cream of the crop." Is it by the teacher's education? Then let's have all the teachers show us their own SAT scores, the colleges they attended, and have them show a college transcript while we're at it. Maybe have them take an IQ test? Or do you identify master teachers by the performance of the students in their class? No teacher, even the "cream of the crop," can make all students perform well if a student doesn't have the desire or capability to do so. Are the best teachers the ones who love to come to school each day and teach, despite the fact that it might not be the most lucrative career choice? For what it's worth, my children have had more than 35 different teachers so far in the Westford schools, and I would consider only 5 of them exceptional teachers. The five I consider exceptional went far beyond the standard curriculum to inspire my children to learn more. They were the ones who noticed a certain talent in a child and fostered it. Most teachers didn't bother to do that. But that is just my personal experience and my personal opinion.

Comment_arrow

Randy Winslow

4:24 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Julie C. They do check all of these things minus the IQ test, which if you were as smart as you think you are, you would know are very outdated. Don't forget if the teachers you children had were so inept or not "exceptional" move them to another district or private schools. And how do you even know what to compare exceptional is when all of your children have gone through the same system.

Don Willis

5:39 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

I love the fact we have $$$$ for Jodi Ross' 2nd assistant, Thousands of Dollar bonuses for Olsen this year and a half million dollar elevator..YET, we are nearly broke and cant afford any step increases for public workers...No wonder these teachers dont believe we are hard up the way we are acting and spending. We (the town) look bad on the timing of this elevator funding with the schools melting down before our eyes!

Reply

Pellegrino Westford

5:46 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Tonight is another mediation between the teachers and SC. Might be last one before
Mass labor board reviews teachers grievance. What are the odds it settles tonight?

Reply

Bill McGirk

6:04 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

This School Committee is so dug in that somehow they arent going to loose in court its like they are on the Titanic 3/4 of the way beneath the sea still thinking it wont sink...Therefore, I wouldnt bet in it but that would be great news for a change. There is so much divide now from what I hear between teachers and the town and the Superintendent that its going to take years to rebuild whats been lost as is.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sam

6:16 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Schools melting down! The Titanic! Be real. The teachers don't have a contract. That's it. They are still paid with all benefits. Melting down is a bit much. I will repeat what I said earlier. If have not been paying the average rates with comparable towns for years now then every teacher we have is of an inferior nature. (this according to the titanic group)

Comment_arrow

Julie C.

8:24 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

But even if the School Committee loses in court, who really loses? It might be some of those younger teachers who will no longer have a job. And please don't say the kids will be the losers, because you know every parent who supports their child's education will continue to do so. I don't care who my children have for a teacher, it's still me who reviews their work, explains what they don't understand, discusses the books they read, and makes damn sure they study and are prepared for their exams. I'll thank the school committee, superintendent, and the town administrators for leaving some cash in my bank account.

Comment_arrow

Randy Winslow

4:26 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Julie C. taxes in Westford are low, if you have a problem paying them perhaps lowell is the place for you.

Bill McGirk

6:33 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Not true Tom, previous to this mess teachers were happy working in a great and supportive system making a little less. Now teachers dont feel supported (its not only negotiations from what I hear) and the pay gap is set to get much bigger...your logic is faulty. I have been told there is a top administrator over at the Stony who is acting like he is melting down as he barks at his staff like a German officer and walks around his building with a look on his face like he just messed his trousers, I have seen some of the emails and I think melt down is appropriate

Reply

Sam

6:35 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

One person's melt down is another person's union contract negotiations. We will disagree on the that.

Reply

Sam

6:37 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

And teachers we hire being inferior, that is the teachers logic not mine.

Reply

Julie C.

10:43 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

A tweet from the Lowell Sun states that the school committee and teachers did not reach an agreement last night.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Andrew Sylvia

4:54 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Comments referring to people as "thugs" have been removed, per our policies.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

7:27 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I am sure you got all sorts of complaints from the intended targets, the truth hurts.

Now, when can we expect you to act on the bogus name being used? Per your terms of use: "Patch believes in transparency, and we ask that all your registration information be truthful. You may not use any aliases or other means to mask your true identity"

thanks

Vinny

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Andrew Sylvia

8:35 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Vinny,

I got a complaint last week on a similar, but unrelated incident and since then we've been enforcing removing "name calling" posts equally. If you see a name calling comment, let me know, and I will remove it as quickly as possible.

However, the part of our terms you referenced discusses registration, not user names.

Patch prefers real names, but they are not required.

Pete Marivich

5:19 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I personally cant ever see teachers being as 'giving' with THEIR free time as they were before regardless of work to rule status, a shame because in my opinion this is the fault of the prom king and prom queen SC duo of harkness-Keele and not the teachers here.
I think the principals jobs have also gotten much tougher in the future as goodwill has been burned to a crisp, good luck getting staff buy in on any new district imitative in the next few years

Reply

Molly

6:10 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

@Randy, Do you even live in Westford??? Do you even know what the median home price is in Westford that we pay taxes on? You have alot of nothing important to say...You must be one of those bitter teachers!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy Winslow

6:37 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Of course I live in Westford(unlike Kathleen Spaeth), they don't tax you on the median home price they tax you on the appraised value of your own home. Chelmsford's rates are as high as Westford and their schools are falling apart. Don't buy a home you can't afford to pay for(including taxes)

Comment_arrow

Christine Flood

6:39 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

OK I'll bite...

Here's a chart of median house value and per capita school spending. Yet again it shows that Westford spends less on it's school systems than surrounding areas. Education is the most important investment in our future. If we can't afford to adequately fund our schools than perhaps we need to look into a proposition 2 1/2 override?

Andover (513,604 median house value, 13,263 per capita spending)
Acton (519,611 median house value, 13,110 per capita spending)
Littleton (401,072 median house value, 11,881 per capita spending)
Westford(451,594 median house value, 10,697 per capita spending)

Median house values from http://www.city-data.com/city/Westford-Massachusetts.html.
Per Capita school spending from http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/state_report/ppx.aspx.

Comment_arrow

Julie C.

7:53 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

But Westford spends more (as a percentage of per capita spending on your chart) on classroom & specialist teachers:
Andover $5281
Acton $4541
Littleton $4443
Westford $4452
Data is from the Mass DOE website.

Beverly Danvers

6:50 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Our cheapness is finally catching up with us. For the past decade we have more than gotten back what we have put in relatively speaking and now the bill has come due. Although this is a difficult financial time I do understand we have underfunded our school system relevant to what we have received. I am OK with paying a little more but if not the result will be a school more like Chelmsford than Acton or Groton.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan D.

9:54 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

The town has done a great job, especially compared to other school systems in the state. For decades, we have had one of the lowest expenditure per student (admittedly, I still do not know what is NOT included in the figures) while having one of the best school systems anywhere. Keep up the good work!
How to you come to the conclusion that the schools are underfunded? Don't we have a lower teacher/student ratio that our goal? Don't we have hundreds of empty seats in the buildings? Hasn't the schools budget increased much more than the budgets of the other town departments over the past few years??

Comment_arrow

Molly

7:34 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

It is not cheapness Beverly that is catching up with us... The ecomony is not great and their is only so many times you can ask the taxpayers to pay more. We have a really well run school system. The teachers are not underpaid by any stretch of the imagination. They could have gotten their steps and cola this year and we could all be in this boat next year. You just don't get it... The teachers will always whine, they always feel underpaid, they always feel not appreciated. I just don't think they will ever be happy so why should the town go completely broke over something noone can fix.... They either appreciate they have a job or they don't. If we were to be in great financial times then yes, I would hope the town would reward them or anyone else who would deserve it. Just because they are in a BULLYING UNION does not mean we have to bow down to them..

Bob Nimitz

7:45 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Vinny,
I guess you can take the boy out of Revere but you cant take the Revere out of the boy, I wish you would get with the Westford Liberals and open up your heart and wallet to change and education!
Thanks for listening,
Bob

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Andrew Sylvia

8:38 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Bob,
This is a heated discussion. Please discuss the issue and not other users.
Thanks.

Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

6:45 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

Andrew, you really bought that name?

You don't see the pattern here (multiple late night posts by a new name many nights)? I suggest you go take a look at the posts by "Bob", "H Munster", ... then you may have a different take on what/who some of these folks are.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Andrew Sylvia

8:20 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

Vincent,

I am neutral, and I have tried to foster discussion while trying to retain civility. Hopefully that's been made clear.

However, I think this thread is nearly out of control.

If I see one more incivil comment toward anyone, I'm going to close comments for everyone. I think I've been more than patient.

Molly

7:27 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

Well said Dan D. I think the school committee has done a great job with the resources they have had. I think the parents of school aged kids have been supportive as well and have paid their part. This is ONE time in a long time I can remember the teachers needed to take one for the team and they won't. SHAME on them.... I hope I am never asked to reach in my pocket ever again to save a teachers job!! If we can't hire the new teacher's, have to lay off some teachers then at this point SO BE IT!!! The teacher's UNION BULLYING isn't going to work... I am not afraid to lose some of you teachers. It will not change my job as a parent. You could have worked with respect now you will work with NONE!!

Reply

Ghost

2:54 am on Sunday, April 7, 2013

WEA is getting ready to get the band back together so to speak and begin demonstration activities once again!
We ain't gonna take it, no we ain't gonna take it, we ain't gonna take it anymore! Monday outside townhall it goes down once again. Green Shirts in force be there if you are probably teacher, continue to throw stones if you are anti teacher. Either way teachers anger has been percolating and it's bubbling to the surface starting now. Hope to see Andrew there for some patch coverage

Reply

Vincent DiRico

5:07 pm on Sunday, April 7, 2013

Oh boo hoo, no 2.5 override, you will have to do with ~ $50 million.

Nice try at shaping public opinion, NOT ;) With these drive-by posts you show your true motives/priorities/... not stuff we want our children seeing.

It is time to take responsibility for the $50 million per year you you accept:
- stop adding positions to cover existing people not doing their jobs (aka the need for a resource officer)
- stop asking for more more more, in the private sector we have learned to do MORE with LESS (aka in the private sector the building technology directors would have been told to SOLVE the need for a technology director, END OF STORY)
- the dreaded private sector has done with less and less $ for years (aka lower service health plans for more $, pensions became 401k s with lower matches, ...)

Reply

Sam

5:55 pm on Sunday, April 7, 2013

I believe that If you throw in benefits and retirement costs the schools budget is over 70% of the towns entire budget. It does nothing but increase every year even though the number of kids has stayed level or dropped. At these prices they need make things work. Start with massive layoffs of administrative fat. Please don't come on here and there is none. Have you ever been in these schools! Unfortunately a suggestion to reduce the budget by $550,000 was shot down in flames by the union members that would have none of that! That may affect their raise next year. The money most certainly is there. The problem is that no public institution has any idea how to run a business. Why is that? Because no matter how poorly they perform, the solution is easy, squeeze the pockets of it taxpayers. This year the budget should have been reduced by 15%. When things start to get eliminated from citizens children education maybe then the would demand more from the inept and unaccountable people in power. Anyone can justify why the need money. Just listen to Olsen and SC each and every year. As for the teachers, I agree they are on a lower scale than some towns. This is because your bosses are fiscally inept. You all have had a full year to seek employment elsewhere. Other than the 8 that left I assume that has not gone well because we are seeing the same old stuff. Good luck squeezing your unearned raises for all. There will be no override.

Reply

Rand

6:26 pm on Sunday, April 7, 2013

the paper vote for the $500k passed at ATM by the blowing, override gonna squeak through too. pay up and shut up

Reply

Sam

6:48 pm on Sunday, April 7, 2013

Uhh no it did not. 140 no 105 yes. Get your facts right. How's the job search going?
Not so well I take it.

Reply

Devils Advocate

7:13 pm on Sunday, April 7, 2013

Well Sam the vote was to decrease the school budget by $500,000 and it failed. Therefore, you with me here, the schools did get their extra half million to fund new positions because 140 people to 105 people wanted it that way. This same margin will push a 2.5 yes vote down your throat so get ready to paaaaaaaayyyyyyy for those new school positions like full Madarin Chinese!!!

Reply

Sam

7:18 pm on Sunday, April 7, 2013

My point was that the motion FAILED! Got that. This town meeting like most, if there are no big issues go just that way. The unions and the straw hats win the day. Bring on 2 1/2 and you won't be able to find a seat. Good luck Devil. Enjoy the relaxing time afforded to your during your upcoming work to rule. Any summer plans?

Reply

Devils Advocate

7:22 pm on Sunday, April 7, 2013

Sam,
Westford's greedy teachers will be especially busy this summer spending their fat prop 2.5 override bonus checks, hope you keep that tax checkbook handy!

Reply

Sam

7:29 pm on Sunday, April 7, 2013

Funny. But now it is time wake up Devil. The dream is over.

Reply

Devils Advocate

7:40 pm on Sunday, April 7, 2013

Sam,
John Lennon said it best: "you may say that Im a dreamer, but Im not the only one..."

Reply

Leave a comment