TELL US: Should Level 1 Sex Offender Information Be Public?
A Wakefield man and tutor who faces numerous child sex charges was a Level 1 sex offender.
Last week, news spread quickly through the region about the indictment of a Wakefield couple for numerous charges stemming from an illegal day care operation where graphic child sexual abuse occurred.
The Middlesex County District Attorney's office alleges that at least 13 children were abused while under the care of John Burbine, 49, at the Waterfall Education Center, which offered tutoring and day care.
Burbine was a level 1 sex offender, which means he had been convicted of a sex-related crime but was deemed least likely to re-offend.
Once an offender is classified as a Level 2 or a Level 3 Offender, his/her sex offender registry information will be available to the public. Level 1 information is not public.
Does this case affect how you feel about the Sex Offender Registry? Would releasing more information about all levels of sex offenders prove helpful? Or, do you think level 1 offenders don't deserve to have their information made public? Tell us in the comments.
Kate H
6:39 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
I think that criminals lose their rights to privacy when they commit a sex crime. Let's go back to the days of stocks in the public square and maybe they should all wear a giant red number on their shirt, indicating their level as well. If they hurt someone, then yes it should be made public.
Anne Shirley
12:25 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
How was this guy deemed a level one? His prior conviction was for indecent assault and battery. Who decided he was "unlikely to reoffend"?
Kevin Sun
6:55 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Who thought it was a good idea for a sex offender to work with children?