LETTER: Update on Mediation from School Committee Chair
The following is a letter to the editor. To send your own letter to the editor, e-mail us at westford@patch.com
Regrettably, the teachers and the School Committee were unable to reach an agreement on a new contract at our Mediation session last evening.
The teachers began the evening proposing a settlement that was, to our surprise, more costly than the last proposal they made two weeks ago. The School Committee responded with two possible settlements both of which were rejected by the teachers.
Finally, we were informed that the teachers could not and would not agree to a proposal that did not include a total of two years of step increases.
This is well beyond what we can afford and still maintain existing programs and staff. It is also well beyond what has been proposed to and accepted by other unions in town. The School Committee made our best and final offer which was rejected. It is our sincere belief that we cannot support a contract that can only be paid for by cutting services to students and laying off staff.
At this point we assume that the teachers' union will proceed on their Unfair Labor Practices claim against the School Committee. A fact finding session is scheduled in that proceeding for next Wednesday.
We will now have to wait and see whether this process will result in cuts to services and/or layoffs of staff. I would also like to correct statements recently made by the teachers that they have made "huge concessions" with regard to health insurance.
The recent change in health insurance negotiated by the Town Manager and agreed to by every Town union provides comparable or better coverage at a huge savings to both the Town and the employees.
Depending on what type of plan they select employees will save between $275 and $925 per year. We remain ready, willing and able to discuss any proposal that is in the best interests of the schoolchildren of Westford in the context of resources available.
Angela Harkness
Chairman, Westford School Committee
Inquiring Mind
4:43 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
SC Harkness says 'cuts' will be made if the teachers win the ULP suit in court next week and the town is forced to pay year 1 steps....ironic since the FY2013 budget is INCREASING staff at the HS in both the Social Studies and English Departments by 1 staff member. So which is it? Do we barely have enough money to patch together EXISTING programs or are we adding staff? How can you expect teachers to believe there is no money to keep existing programs in place as they are being increased although the town cant properly fund them? What a load of rubbish! Westford wants it cake and doesnt want to pay for it.
Ok, The impact is going to be a quickly sinking public school system where staff does whats required and not a single bit more which is an incredible shame because WPS have been a place where teachers have always been very giving with their PERSONAL time for students. That ends here today.....
Randy Winslow
5:38 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Excellent comment.
June Mary
12:35 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
The staff increases are offset by staff reductions in other areas of the school system.
Julie Dugan
4:35 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Mluther: The new positions are NOT because of offset to staff reductions in other areas. The school is not reducing it IS ADDING 3% in the 2013 budget which includes 100% NEW positions. Therefore, its not simply a matter of saving existing jobs when the town is bringing on NEW people/positions next year. Lets start by cutting those jobs!!!
Bob Daily
4:46 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
I wonder what Harkness thinks about the Arciero/Antonelli Teen Marijuana legislation? as chair of the school committee I would think she would support legislation that takes away a Jr operators license from a teenage pothead, as she has been negotiating the contract it seems Jim Antonelli has been left to deal with all the Marijuana issues by himself at WA.
Andrew Sylvia
5:06 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Hi Bob,
If you'd like, you can send a letter to the editor regarding other issues, but please keep comments here to the letter itself.
Randy Winslow
5:43 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Andrew is there anyway you could ask Ms. Harkness about the increase in staff and technology funds, and the overall increase in the budget? How about why the letter misstates that the teacher's new proposal was greater than the last one? These are facts that should be checked, from an ethical journalistic point of view correct?
Andrew Sylvia
7:04 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Hi Randy,
I can definitely crosscheck those statements to see if they're accurate. I'll aim to put what I find in a future Patch Answers column.
I can't agree or disagree with Chairwoman Harkness' opinion otherwise, and she's entitled to it in this letter to the editor, as is anyone in Westford.
Weston Watson
5:58 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
The town is going to lose in court next week as she (A.H) all but concedes, she has LIED to the town all along when she said steps were not paid in the past when working with an expired contract and that will be proven next week. I do not expect she is going to apologize for her lack of truthfulness to folks in town but so be it.
YES its time to start cutting services you cant pay for....New housing keeps going up in town, more and more new business- I do NOT believe that the town is nearly broke or contend that if it is that questions are asked of town management on how they have put an affluent community on the verge of meltdown! I guess Bill Olson is not giving that $2,000 school Committee awarded fall bonus back anytime soon? Go figure. I guess he has 'earned' that but teachers have not earned their previously negotiated steps.
Cat M
6:38 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Parents of 8th graders and seniors might need to start drawing straws to see who is going to chaperone the Washington, DC and Disney trips.
June Mary
12:26 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
You should make sure that you have stocked up your pantry to tide you over when the layoffs are implemented.
jons
7:35 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
How can Angela just lie and get away with it? She has lied about teachers never previously receiving steps and now this letter is full of lies! Teachers did not demand more last night than 2 weeks ago.
Well as they say about Karma whats going around comes around....and whats on the web is out there for good
Jesse James
3:15 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Jons
Angela Harkness may be many things but a liar she is not. The contract that you are basing your vitriol on is no longer in existence. Talk to some of your union member acquaintances in industry. Their answer will be "No Ticket. No Laundry" No contract means no pay and no benefits. if the Westford School Committee was playing hard ball, the committee would have cancelled your health insurance, any fringes including the one that allow teachers to send their children to Westford schools at no cost for which the Westford school system receives NO SCHOOL CHOICE funding.
Plus reset your pay to B-1 interim until the WEA approved the contract.
I believe that you and your WEA compatriots owe Ms Harkness an apology for your unprofessional behavior.
Rich F
4:07 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Tony - How would the committee cancel the teacher's health insurance? Unless I'm mistaken, I don't see any mention of health insurance in the contract. If it's not in the contract then it doesn't matter if the contract is expired or not, right?
http://educatorcontracts.doemass.org/view.aspx?recno=297
Jesse James
9:13 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Rich F- If the benefits are not listed in the contract would that mean that you are not protected by the expired contract?
If I were you, I would contact the MTA legal counsel to verify the status of your medical benefits.
Andrew Sylvia
8:19 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Hey folks, I said it last night, and I gave a warning today, from here on, any off the topic comments will be deleted, as I just did now. If things get too out of control, I'll close this to future comments.
Anybody wants to send a letter to the editor on a separate topic, they're more than welcome to do so as long as their letters follow our terms of service.
June Mary
12:24 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
What is the problem Andy, First Amendment Rights only apply to journalists?
Andrew Sylvia
9:22 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
Mr. Luther,
By posting here, you agree to follow the rules (westford.patch.com/terms). If you can't respect Patch's first amendment rights to those rules, you're welcome to leave.
Jesse James
3:05 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Mr Sylvia, I was under the impression the Westford Patch was an electronic medium that simulated a weekly town paper. Furthermore, I was under the impression that you are an employee of a business corporation that depends on fees from advertisers to pay your salary. Advertisers are very skittish about supporting media outlets that antagonize the views of the customers or potential customers. Please note Glenn Beck situation. Although Mr. Beck had a very popular show and presented detailed information on various topics, he obviously upset enough individuals that in turn put pressure on advertisers who in turn told Fox New either Beck goes or we will cancel our advertising.
Therefore, I am appalled at your reply to MLuther's observation. I hope that you understand that you are a facilitator and not a dictator.
Thank You
MAHM3
10:46 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
How can Angela say that Westford is in such hard economic times when Jodi Ross has turned around and hired a second assistant. Jodi can cry me a river on how there is no money for this or that. But when she wants something the funds magically appear.
You can't put the children first if you put the teachers last.
One thing Angela forgot to mention in her letter is the clause in all the other union contracts that were agreed to, which is their contract gets opened back up to get the same increase that teachers would get. A large point she forgot to share with the public!
MAHM3
10:49 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Also if she correctly stated the facts, it was only retired teachers that received any type of savings.
Bill McGirk
4:48 am on Friday, February 3, 2012
As residents in town we need to start asking some tough questions of our officials and Administrators. Having talked to some teachers in town and relatives who teach in towns nearby, I have come to understand step increases in the first 15 years for teachers is an automatic given. This is done across the country not just here in MA. If all the sudden we dont have the money to find what is expected of us as a town HOW DID IT COME TO THIS?
The bad recession of the past 5 years as hit the entire state/country....and yet when I asked around it seems our neighboring towns are all honoring the step increases. I for one an extremely concerned on the impact this is all going to have on education in town, my niece teaching nearby has said that teachers there cant believe we are withholding teachers steps from the last contract. My experience with teachers here in town has been 90% incredibly positive, and I know of numerous examples of teachers going way above their requirements to help kids.
We should have seen this coming several years back so how did we budget for the fiscal needs of the town? 15 years ago Westford was a very desirable place to live no strip malls and first rate schools. How the time change I guess. Now Market Basket Plazas all over the place and we will loose veteran teachers who go elsewhere to teach for the last several years of the careers and loose new teachers to are better paying neighbors. Time for some questions of those running the ship right now.
Jesse James
9:16 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Bill- Automatic annual step increases regardless of performance??? What a sweet deal. Only one problem, no contract means no automatic step increases. What a novel idea.
Molly
8:42 am on Friday, February 3, 2012
I for one believe that it is time for the teachers to stop whining. US parents of the kids have paid and paid to keep this school system what it is. We pay bus fees, activity fees, sport fees, instrument fees, higher taxes every year just to keep alot of these teachers in tact. The teachers are not receiving a step increase woopie, everyone is working on less and paying MORE! Never mind some of these teachers who live in less expensive towns and get to take advantage of sending their kids to this school system all while paying less taxes where they live! Maybe cut that offering! It is unfortunate that the teachers have taken such a whiny approach, showing up all over town and events, wearing their black to express how poorly treated they are. The unfortunate part is they are probably the teachers we cant get rid of... There are so many wonderful teachers in this school system who have a passion about teaching these kids and these greedy ones are giving a bad reputation to the rest of them. If they dont like what is offered here like the rest of the private sector has to do go find a better job somewhere else. Take your ball and go HOME!
Heather
9:24 am on Friday, February 3, 2012
Great Comment!
Jimboo Jones
3:24 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
From a teacher in Westford. Its not about a few greedy teachers and some wonderful teachers, WE are very unified about how we are being treated and 95% of us are in 'this' together so please dont think its a small bunch of 'bad apples' YOU say there are 'so many wonderful teachers' well let me tell you nearly all of those wonderful teachers are fed up, frustrated, not about the lack of cost of living increase but previous years of negotiations being 'taken back; even when this violates MA labor negotiation laws (as you will see next week after this matter is taken to the Labor relations board in Boston).
Molly
4:22 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
I would not care if this goes the teacher's way through the Labor Relations Board or a Court of Law, I do not put much creedence to these boards, good old common sense. Parents , and alot of the people in this town are just as fed up and frustrated as we continue to pay and pay and pay and the teachers working 180 give or take school days complain they are not given what they are entitled to!!! I think alot of people who work in the private sector are FED UP paying guaranteed pay to people who may or may not be deserving of it just because you are a UNION! Really! Complain that you work and prepare on your own time, YES, that is called Making A Living! Something a good portion of the world has to do. Ask anyone who has to get up at 3:00am to catch a flight, and be on conference calls well into the evening... Yes, to provide for their family, and Yes they work YEAR ROUND and sometimes not being able to take a vacation..... I support the school committe has really tried to work with the teachers. TIme for teachers to get in the REAL WORLD!
Heather
9:03 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
I guess they wont want to teach my children either! Oh well. I'm with you. Both my brother and sister are teachers and are new in their careers so I understand all the evening hours but i also understand that I had all those same evening hours in my career but i didn't get all the holidays and breaks and summers. Get rid of the union and its dues and they get an instant raise! Unions had their time and place. It is not in the 21st century in the US.
Heather
9:23 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Almost forgot... i dont get a pension either. I'll pay for my own continuing education in exchange for a retirement check
Sam Gompers
9:41 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Heather,
Why do you feel Unions are no longer needed in the 21st Century? Is it because now all employers treat their workers fairly on their own 100% of the time? I dont think so. Unions play the same important role today as they did 100 years ago. Thank the organized Labor movement for YOUR right to collectively organize and form unions in your workplace as well should you so desire. I ask all reading do you feel you and your co workers are treated fairly ALL the time where you work? If the answer is 'yes, absolutely' then great. If the answer is 'not always' this is why unions still play a vital role in securing workers rights.
Not all but many in private industry get bonuses (some VERY large) when times are good. My neighbor who works for Raytheon received a $25,000 bonus in the past. Teachers do not and should not be subjected to the same 'market' fluctuations in the economy. Nobody believes a teacher should get a huge bonus or 10-15% raise when times are good but when things are bad teachers are 'out of touch' and 'greedy' when they ask for 1-2%
Heather
12:15 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
I doubt anyone in a union or otherwise feels they are treated fairly all the time. Life isn't fair. Teachers do not work egredious conditions.
AB
4:30 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Not going to union-bash, but I agree with Molly - private sector employees do all of that and more, of late with little to no raises at all. While there are actions, and quite a few of them, the central office administration COULD take to cut corners and save some money, teachers need to remember their neighbors are paying for those salaries and step increases.
How about a cap on INDIVIDUAL increases, so NO employee (union or otherwise) receives more than a 3% annual increase in salary, bonuses, or benefits for the life of the 3-year contract. Then, if the economy improves at the next round, you make adjustments accordingly.
Having the system pass out compensation annually in excess of 5-10% for ANY individual employee is not sustainable within a 2.5 to 3% town growth model.
You are either cutting compensation and saving jobs, or cutting jobs to protect compensation. You can't have it both ways.
Local
10:26 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
"Almost forgot... i dont get a pension either. I'll pay for my own continuing education in exchange for a retirement check"
@Heather
Mass teachers receive a pension in lieu of Social Security. That pension is funded by teacher contributions. In some districts the town also chips in as part of the compensation package - but in Westford contributions are given entirely by the teachers at a rate of 11% of gross salary. As I am sure you are aware, you in the private sector contribute 6.2% for Social Security, your employer pays the other 6.2%.
Last year you only paid 4.2%.
You are free to contribute an additional 4.8% of your gross to a retirement fund to supplement SS.
SS payers take their retirement fund with them to any private sector job, anywhere in the U.S. Teachers cannot get both a pension and SS. So those 5-10 years many teachers paid into SS before they started with the teaching position is gone. They also cannot leave once they have been in the public sector for a while as they will not have enough time to become sufficiently vested in SS or the pension, and they can only have one or the other. They retire at higher wages, but they contribute 77% more than u their entire career for 30 years, and SS keeps all those other wages they paid to SS. Up your total contributions by this much and you can do much better than just SS. No one ever mentions the nearly 77% more teachers contribute throughout their career when mentioning the pension.
Heather
10:14 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Local,
You are good at manipulating figures to make your point.
While 77% seems shocking, it only represents the difference between 6.2% and 11% and if one compares the benefit at the end, it seems a small price to pay. "They retire at higher wages, but they contribute 77% more than u their entire career for 30 years, and SS keeps all those other wages they paid to SS." So instead of shocking everyone lets plug those figures into a calculator. If you use 40 years, a retirement age of 65 and a final salary of $60,000, a teacher retires with an annual minimum retirement payment of $48,000 and a private sector employee retires with a maximum annual benefit of $18,000. Teachers get 266% more for their additional 4.8% contribution. To be fair, the future value of the additional teacher contribution at 5% interest rate is less than $250,000. This covers less than 10 years of the difference in retirement. And, obviously, a 5% rate is unrealistic so the future value is much less.
Your statement that "SS payers take their retirement fund with them to any private sector job, anywhere in the U.S. Teachers cannot get both a pension and SS" is false. There are only a few states that do not allow collecting a pension and SS. I"ll give you that Mass is one that doesn't allow it but as computed above I think teachers here do just fine.
Heather
10:15 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
You need 40 non-consecutive quarters to collect SS and 10 years of contributions for the pension in the Mass system. I cannot address your concern that a teacher is leaving money social security money on the table because i'm not sure if a career change the is the reason teachers are contributing 5-10 years before they start a teaching position or is it a summer job? I have to believe there really aren't very many quarters working under the ss system if teaching is the chosen profession.
Rich F
8:57 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Molly wrote:
"Ask anyone who has to get up at 3:00am to catch a flight, and be on conference calls well into the evening... "
Out of curiosity, what line of work are you in?
Rich F
9:04 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Amber Brown wrote:
"How about a cap on INDIVIDUAL increases, so NO employee (union or otherwise) receives more than a 3% annual increase in salary, bonuses, or benefits for the life of the 3-year contract. Then, if the economy improves at the next round, you make adjustments accordingly.
Having the system pass out compensation annually in excess of 5-10% for ANY individual employee is not sustainable within a 2.5 to 3% town growth model."
Amber, who are the people getting annual increases in excess of 5-10%? Below is the 2010-2011 salary schedule for Westford teachers with a masters degree. Excessive increases huh?
1 $48,450
2 $50,170 3.6%
3 $51,890 3.4%
4 $53,611 3.3%
5 $55,333 3.2%
6 $57,052 3.1%
7 $58,774 3.0%
8 $60,494 2.9%
9 $62,215 2.8%
10 $63,937 2.8%
11 $65,658 2.7%
12 $67,496 2.8%
13 $69,255 2.6%
14 $73,355 5.9%
Rich F
4:22 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Heather: "And, obviously, a 5% rate is unrealistic so the future value is much less."
Why is a 5% rate of return unrealistic?
AB
9:17 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Rich,
That implies that a teacher only goes up a step, and not over as well. Still, and again - most men I know are diligently looking for work. The ones who are employed have, over the past couple of years, been lucky to receive 1-2% increases annually, are working 60 hour weeks, with 2 weeks paid vacation per year, with less lucrative benefit packages. Yes, taking work home, and yes, flying on weekends to and from client sites.
Rich F
11:12 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Amber - What is the annual compensation for these jobs of 60+ hours per week with take home work and weekend flying? Also, how many men is "most men I know"? 3, 5, 10?
Heather
1:36 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Rich-
Pension funds typically invest in Corporate and government bonds. Interest rates are at historic lows. A 30 year government bond now yields less than 3.25%. I can't remember the source, but i recently read that the FED did not expect to raise rates in the next couple years to combat falling home values and inflation risk. If you look at corporate earnings on their investments as a comparison, it is almost nothing. If your retirement account is invested in mutual funds you probably are seeing much better returns. All this said, i did not look to see what the teachers' retirement fund is investing in but in my past i did audit unions and their benefit funds and never saw funds invested in anything but government and AAA rated bonds. My analysis is also flawed in that i didn't compute the fv fairly in that i gave credit for contributing based on the highest salary of $60K for 20 years and $40K for 20 years. In reality (and after a quick google search), 40 years ago the average teacher salary was less than $10K and 30 years ago it was less than $20K. This means that the difference in the 11% contribution and the 6.2% contribution has a future value significantly less than $250K and tax payers are funding even more of the pension.
Rich F
2:53 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Heather wrote:
"Rich-
Pension funds typically invest in Corporate and government bonds"
Heather - I'd be willing to guess that is only a portion of pension fund investments are in bonds. The company I work for contributes to four different multi-employer pension plans and I am a trustee on one of them. All 4 have diversified portfolios of investments. The plan I am a trustee on is currently invested in the following, followed by their weight in the fund:
BNY MEllon US Equity 17.9%, Vanguard Small Cap Index 15%, Laudus Mondrian International Equity 11.7%, Richmond Capital Low Duration Fixed Income 33.5%, PIMCO High Yield 8.3%, PIMCO All Asset 13.6% . As you can see, 41.8% of our holdings are in fixed income (bonds). Without diversifying and taking on some amount of risk there is absolutely no way we could possibly meet our future obligations by investing in bonds only. I also don't know how the town of Westford invests it's pension assets.
Heather
4:02 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Therein lies the problem Rich. Pension can't keep up without some risk and generally they are risk adverse - at least for public/government employees. I do see in their statements that they get a 700M "pension fund appropriation" that i can only assume comes from the state budget. I can not get a handle on what their return on investment is... bear bones it looks like 1 or 2% plus unrealized gains from their PRIT fund. I'm curious what company you work for b/c pensions are not the norm these days - I dont expect an answer and i think we've gone way off topic here. My only point is complaining about retirement is not a legitimate complaint. Maybe the contribution is almost 5% more than the rest of us under ss but the payout under the pension far exceeds ss and i've tried to show the proof.
AB
8:16 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Rich: Off the top of my head regarding the friends close enough to discuss such matters, the two who travel the most have contracts expiring next quarter and may not still have a job after that (their gross is a bit higher but remember they have to take out their own taxes), 3 have been looking for 2+ years to no avail, 3 are on a pay freeze (no COLA, raises, bonuses, etc.) and are pumping out resumes just in case, only two have gotten raises in the past two years and they've been less than 2%. The latter two have been in the tech field for about 10 years so my guess is their salary is about $70k.
So everyone is doing more with less. Everyone but Mitt Romney, that is.
Cat M
5:09 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
I really feel bad for anyone who has to teach this previous poster's children. It must be very frustrating to try to work with parents who believe that teaching is only a part-time gig and who feel that educators do not live in the real world. At 60-80 hours a week, a mandated masters degree, and many working second and third jobs to pay for student loans and to make ends meet, I believe that teachers really do understand what it means to be in the real world.
My experience has been that anyone who is not a good teacher does not get to stick around Westford very long.
Sadly, there are too many people in the world who have the misconception that teachers who want a fair contract clearly do not care about the children and those who do care about children, would willingly do the job for less money. Find me another profession that has a state-mandated masters degree plus a required number of professional development hours, courses, and conferences (all at the employee's expense) where the professionals are willing to work for the love of the job. Teaching is a livelihood.
Don't be frustrated because you choose to work a "year round" job. There are plenty of universities around that offer masters degrees in education. Then, you can leave your private sector job, go to work for less than $1000 a week, and do it only "part-time".
June Mary
12:30 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
With low SAT scores, average less than 440 in each area, attending third rate colleges and partying all night, most teachers cannot qualify for a job at a convenience store.
Why are they demanding that their compensation exceed $85/hr. worked?
Joe Lehanne
6:41 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Cat,
Thank you and know I support teachers in Westford 100%. My wife teaches in another town (Acton) and she makes about $10,000 more per year than she would if she were teaching in Westford. I know times of tight for everyone right now but Teachers have been lower paid in Westford than many surrounding towns (Action, Concord, Groton, Harvard, Lincoln, Lexington) and residents in town should know that these towns are not looking to take away step increases from teachers. (Westford's financial meltdown is a running joke now at AB). The Great Recession has NOT hit Westford disproportionately hard according to anything I have heard...Hang in there teachers many here in town DO support you and value that you are not 'part time' workers who sit around relaxing with all that 'time off'.
ann
3:20 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
When the new Stony Brook School opened I was offered a 7th grade position in the Social Studies department by Dr. Foster. Thinking that I would love to work in the town that I teach in, I seriously considered it. (I had been teaching in Reading for about 6 years at the time) But after looking at the compensation package, I decided to keep the position that I had. I would have taken a $10,000 pay cut, paid 10% more for my health insurance and have had no accured sick time until year four. Reading also pays for professional development for their teachers. The benefit package offered by the town was not comparable to the town I was teaching in. I have been teaching in Reading for 16 years, have a masters degree and have presented a many conferences both Regional and National. I beleive I would have been a real assest to this town. Both of my boys have had wonderful, dedicated teachers....if they ever want to come to Reading, I would love to help them get a job!
Julie C.
3:40 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
@ Ann,
If teachers are receiving higher pay and a better compensation package in Reading, why are the Reading students not performing as well as the students in Westford on MCAS? Many people here continue to argue that higher teacher salaries means better quality teachers and therefore better student performance. I think you have just proved otherwise...
Patrick Henry
2:44 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Wake up Joe!! As Bob Dylan sings "The Times They are a Changing." Your TM Ledoux will drop the bad news on you this spring. Hope that Acton either passes a $7 million Prop 2 1/2 override or your wife has enough seniority to keep her job.
BTW Acton received well over $10 million in FSF for FY11 and FY12. The FSF funds are gone for FY13 and beyond, so say a little prayer for your wife's job.
Molly
9:42 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Thank You Heather, Many teachers have enjoyed teaching my children as they have learned to be hard working and earn what you get. They have to have part time jobs and are part of many activities.
Cat, just remember YOU chose that career path and all that came with it. YOU chose to be paid by taxpayer dollars! And even though Masters are not state mandated you and everyone else knows they are standard in todays world and yes paid by the individual who are now carrying student loans for them.
Joe, thank you for backing up my comment as well if they think they can get paid better somewhere else as a bordering town, it is a free world and they are more than welcome to go and try. You also mention towns (Acton Lexington, Concord) and I can see why they are paid more, they are rated much higher than our schools.
Now compare Westford to Chelmsford, Billerica, Tyngsboro, Littleton, Dracut, and I am pretty sure they are paid fair compare to these towns.
My point was that the teachers in Westford have been greatly supported by the school committee, parents, and a great community. Something I and many have taken pride in. They did not get there step increases and this is the thanks and appreciation and taking one for the team as we all have. Yes, a big slap in the face of my children sitting in their classrooms and to represent how poorly treated you have been. I take great offense to that as I know many parents talking around town feel too.
Molly
9:52 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Also, the scare tactics/bullying of having to chaperone D.C, Disney and dances, I am sure would not be a problem. The parents in this town are great and have always been there for their kids. I am pretty sure the teacher/chaperones do not pay their way for these trips??
Don't forget the wonderful fundraising that parents, and the community, clubs and activities have done for the turf fields.
Just another example of a very supportive community that knows how to work toward a common goal!
June Mary
12:58 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Sorry Molly, you are wrong!!!! Using MCAS scores as the metric Westford is equal to or superior in quality to AB, Lexington, Concord, Newton, Andover , etc. Using the SAT as the metric, Westford is also in the equal to superior classification when compare to the top 10 rated public schools in the state. Why?? The Westford student population is 21% Asian.
LC
10:39 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Molly,
I'd love to know why you decided to compare Westford with towns such as Chelmsford, Billerica, Tyngsboro, Littleton, or Dracut? Are their MCAS scores comparable to Westford's? (I suspect the answer is NO). I wonder if a reason that towns such as Acton, Lexington, and Concord are rated higher than Westford is because on average they spend $5000 MORE than Westford PER pupil. Food for thought.
Molly
12:47 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
They are just local towns that we are ranked higher than and sure the pay shows it. Maybe the mcas score aren't as high. But I for one have had to pay on the side tutoring for my child to assist in passing the mcas. Something the school/teacher was unable to accomplish. I know of alot of people that have had to pay tutoring on the side so for as many great teachers there are and the wonderful mcas scores again parents have stepped up for their children. The teachers cannot take all the credit for the mcas scores.
June Mary
1:00 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
The real facts. Westford schools so well on MCAS, PSATs and SAT because 21% of the students in Westford are Asian.
Julie C.
3:26 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
It's more likely that towns such as Acton and Lexington are performing slightly better than Westford on MCAS due to slightly higher Asian populations...23%, 29%, and 18% respectively (according to the 2011-2012 doe.mass.edu website.) It is well known that Asian parents supplement their children's education with programs like the Russian School of Math, IDEA Math, Johns Hopkins CTY, and others.
AB
4:38 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
MCAS scores and actual learning (not measured by a standardized test) are not related to per-pupil expenditures. This has been proven time and time again. It's a dead argument to even look at PPE - hell, look at Springfield's PPE vs. our and their results. Neither has a damn thing to do with teacher compensation, either.
Want to be a teacher and not be subject to taxpayer issues? Go teach at a private school. :)
Kathleen Spaeth
11:35 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Enough with the comparing of Westford to the surrounding towns and let's deal with the current Teacher Contract Negotiations at hand!
The Teachers of Westford and the School Committee cannot come to an agreement on a new contract. Understandably this has made many people upset and bewildered and it causes us to pick a side (do I side with the Teachers or the School Committee?) and then some of you come on the Westford Patch and insult each other! Stop it!!
The hard facts are that the School Committee cannot afford two years of step increases without cutting existing services to students and laying off staff. The teachers of Westford will not negotiate anything but their two years of step increases. There isn't any other monies available to pay the Teacher's step increases and if the teachers persist with their demands of getting two years of step increases, than some of their collegues will be layed off and services to the students that they are suppose to be working for will be cut. This is it and the bottom line!
Now how do both parties come to an agreement when neither wants to comprimise? First, we stop insulting each other and then we "seriously" sit down and negotiate. The blustering and the actions of the Teacher's Union filing an Unfair Labor Practice will unfortunately be the impetus to what is decided. Do I ask for a pay raise for myself and then watch my fellow colleague pack up their desk and go home without a job to return too?
AB
4:42 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
"Do I ask for a pay raise for myself and then watch my fellow colleague pack up their desk and go home without a job to return too?"
Agreed.
Bob Scadoole
5:18 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Kathleen,
You do know the scools got a 3% increase for next year budget which includes new teaching positions right?
The people packing their bags are teachers who have not been hired yet....
Local
5:46 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
The budget for this school year was approved almost a year ago, it included the step raises...now all of a sudden the money is gone. The Westford school system is one of the most cost efficient in the state. They supposedly can't make ends meet and they want to squeeze more efficiency out of the teachers?
June Mary
12:34 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
How about a $10 million dollar Prop 2 1/2 override and a $10 million debt exclusion which will raise taxes by 15% for homeowners?
Patrick Henry
2:15 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Are you insane or delusional from drinking the heavily treated town water. A 15% increase in real estate taxes means $900+/year for the average homeowner.
June Mary
12:52 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
12:42 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
How about the school committee play hard ball and reduce the pay-level of all teachers to B-1 Interim which is the recognized pay level for individuals that are not expected to be employed in the following year.
Dwight Tuna
1:53 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
So there is money for Jody Ross to get a 2nd assistant and Bill Olsen to get a several thousand dollar raise this year? Interesting... If westford pays its teachers like Dracut a 'Dracut like' education is what the town is going to provide! Way to go!
Dwight Tuna
1:55 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
I would like to ask a question: The economy has been BAD for the past 5 years....how come only Westford cant honor even previous step increases? Most teachers in nearby districts (please look into this yourself) have received small raises in the past 2 years (steps and 1-2% over 3 years) Who is the one that mismanaged our finances so badly that we are near broke but neighboring towns are not??? If we have to start laying off teachers I hope some town managers are also 'let go'
Steven Foster
3:54 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Do you all hear that sound? Thats the sound of the Westford bubble bursting!
Strip mall Market Baskets, traffic, and Public Schools where the better teachers with job mobility will be leaving Marijuana use all over the high School. Yikes!
Local
5:40 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
@MLuther
Where are you getting that asian population from? The most recent number is here:
http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/state_report/enrollmentbyracegender.aspx
The number is 17.5 currently. Unless your margin of error is 20% it's a pretty large discrepancy (I guess your not asian)
Besides, since when did Asian kids start teaching themselves. Teachers are blamed when the kids don't do well on MCAS, Teachers are discredited when the kids do perform well on MCAS. Which ethnicity to we chalk up double standards like this to?
Julie C.
6:07 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
@Local
It is a fact that Asian parents supplement their children's education. Many, many, many Asian students here in Westford attend the Russian School of Math, IDEA Math, Johns Hopkins CTY, Khan Academy on-line, etc. The Westford teachers aren't teaching them what is required to score 800 on the Math SAT when they are still in middle school, yet some have done it. Many Asian parents demand that their children do well academically and they are willing to pay for the extra knowledge these outside programs provide. They are teaching themselves, via these programs, much more at a younger age than the standard curriculum does. Kudos to them...and this high academic achievement does have a positive impact on the town's MCAS scores.
Local
6:20 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Julie C.
I fail to see the same sort of due diligence when reporting bad MCAS or performance in any regard, blame goes straight to the teachers. Parents being involved and kids over achieving just goes to show what the schools are capable of. I assure you, asian kids or any kids don't' walk into class already taught. These are kids, not calculators. They are taught more than math, and in more than just middle school. Also, if the teachers were "bad" the rest of the unlearned ethnicities are more than enough to combat the higher scores from the ethnicities that "walk in already taught." So mathematically it's a moot point.
Julie C.
7:03 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
@Local
I never said the teachers were "bad". I think Westford has many well-qualified teachers. I think they do a good job of teaching Westford's children. After seeing their pay scale, I think they are paid adequately for the service they provide. I do feel that the success of Westford's students is also due to the demographics of the town. Paying teachers more and more every year, along with sweet benefits packages, isn't going to have a significant impact on how Westford's students perform.
AB
10:00 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Oh hahahahaha! Is this like those crappy bumper stickers that say, "If you can read this, thank a teacher"??? GUess what? All four of my kids started reading and writing well before they hit any formal preschool or public education facility. *I* want a bumper sticker which reads, "If you can read this, thank an involved parent."
Julie is right, Kumon and other outside tutoring agencies (along with math and science-minded parents who "afterschool" their children) are a solid reason why the scores are so good. The incontrovertible truth is Everyday Math sucks, but thank one or more of our "indispensable" poor-excuse-for-a-teacher-salary-or-two curriculum coordinators are responsible for that atrocity hitting Westford. My 4th grader comes home weekly, frustrated because she has the right answer to a math question computationally, but she failed to explain it in words as requested by the "teacher". The literacy component as part of math is simply turning away future mathematicians and scientists who do not have a gift for writing.
Westford students are good because of their parents, the value the family places on education, and socioeconomic status. Period, end of discussion, bottom line.
June Mary
10:30 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Local. The % of Asian students in Westford schools are as follows
Day Elementary 32.1
Rita E. Miller Elementary 30.8
Stony Brook School 21.0
Millennium Elementary 20.6
Col John Robinson 19.2
John A. Crisafulli 18.1
Blanchard Middle 15.1
Nabnasset 13.4
Westford Academy 12.7
Abbot Elementary 10.0
the above listed information were obtained from the URL that you provided. I do not see the number 17.5 currently or otherwise appearing for Westford at the URL provided.
In answer to your question "since when did Asian kids start teaching themselves?"
Anytime that they are not being impacted by an incompetent caucasian.
In answer to your question "Which ethnicity to we chalk up double standards like this to?" The ethnicity that is prevalent among the MTA members. I really think that you should reconsider your chosen profession.
Rich F
9:47 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
M Luther....I'm not sure how you missed this....it's at the very top of the page. Unless of course you just don't want to admit you're spreading false information by not acknowledging the percentage is 17.5%.
http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/profiles/student.aspx?orgcode=03260000&orgtypecode=5&fycode=2012
Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity (2011-12)
Race % of District % of State
African American 0.5 8.3
Asian 17.5 5.7
Hispanic 1.1 16.1
Native American 0.1 0.2
White 78.4 67.0
Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander 0.1 0.1
Multi-Race, Non-Hispanic 2.3 2.5
Patrick Henry
2:35 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
I checked the #s that MLuther provided and they are right on the money. The figures that you quote are those for the whole system. You must realize the MCAS go from 4,6,8 and 10 grades. So the actual number to be used for MCAS are basically 4 thru 10 grades. Note, the lower % of WA students that are Asian that will change in the coming years as the middle school students enter WA.
Local
5:53 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
The Westford town budget is online for everyone to see. Here you go…
http://www.westfordma.gov/pages/government/towndepartments/westfordma_townmanager/documents/budgets/
If you look at the tax presentations for each year, the town’s income from taxes continues to grow, not go down. Your property tax rates have grown in line with everyone else's....a little under actually. In fact, the town’s income as a whole continues to grow. Through what means I don’t know but this idea that the money just isn’t there is another bald faced lie. I'll put the links below.
If you want to concern yourself with the facts of what your teachers are giving you. Boston magazines ratings of Massachusetts school districts, Westford is number 26. Top 6.6% in the state (Boston magazine only posts the top 135 districts, there is actually 393). This is only Boston magazine’s opinion, based on whatever criteria they decide. If you want cold hard facts and more truth we can check out Mass.gov
Local
6:24 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
So Westford Teachers manage to be in Boston Magazine’s top 6.6% (consistenly I might add) However their cost expenditure per student is also in the top 6.6% They are one of the highest efficiency group of teachers in the state. There kids per classroom is a harder figure to get an accurate read on because of the way they monitor it, but either way they are close to the middle at 18. Someone might jump in here and say that Westford teachers have it easier, they should be thankful that the we the tax payer’s only have them manage 18 kids. Wrong. You want your teachers to have the fewest kids per classroom possible (this is about the kids right?) It gives them more time to devote to each kid. What makes this prohibitive is your cost per student ratio. When it gets too high the easiest way to get it back down is by adding more kids to the classroom. The fact that they are in the bottom half of average is only a further testament to their performance. They could get it down to 15 kids per class and people would scream for a pay cut. If they can keep their cost per kid ratio in the top 6.6%, you want them to have as few kids per class as possible. See how things can be expressed in a way that doesn’t reflect the truth?
Randy Winslow
8:25 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
@Local, thank you for intelligence, it is rarely seen on the "Westford Patch."
Local
5:55 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
So with all these numbers Westford teachers should definitely be paid in the top 6.6% I mean it only stands to reason if that is the level they perform at, a fair compensation would be top 6.6% in the state? They are paid the same as teachers performing at the 40% level, just above average.
Well in the interest of the truth, how do they compare to the rest of the United States? Maybe Massachusetts as a state is overpaid compared to the rest of the U.S.A. If that is the case maybe the performance to pay discrepancy of the Westford teachers is offset and we can pull out the pitch forks and call them greedy again. The most accurate way to compare state to state is not by doing a straight wage comparison. $50k in California does not afford the same level of living as $50k in Kentucky. A crude example would be housing. You can buy a house in Florida for $120k. If a teacher in MA was making 60k per year they could buy a house in Florida for 2 years Gross wages. If they try to buy the same level of housing in California it would take them 10 years. This is another area where someone who wants to mislead you would jump right to a straight wage comparison.
Local
6:47 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
The calculation is rather complex, but it's called (link below) a “Salary Comfort Index” which takes into account cost of living. Massachusetts teacher’s as a group r number 34 out of 50. Their 10 year increase from starting pay they rank 35 out of 50. The “tax payers” pay them less and give them smaller raises.
At the risk of sounding “reasonable” let’s put this in perspective. 34 out of 50 makes sense if they r performing 34th out of 50. Heck, maybe they really stink and we r giving them a deal. Massachusetts is #1 in performance. Our students and teachers r the highest performing in the nation according 2 many sources. So really, Massachusetts teachers should be close to number #1 on that Salary Comfort Index. MA is also one of only 3 States as of 2010 that requires it’s teachers get at least a Master’s Degree, but then we don’t want to pay them more? You r mandating a higher caliber teacher, well guess what, a teacher with a master's degree gets paid more than one without. Heck, since it comes for free let's just require they all have doctorates. You can't require more w/o paying more. It's a system that doesn't sustain itself, you should understand that concept since it seems to be the basis of your argument. People expect teachers to keep giving for the love of the kids, its unfair. They are regular people who get discouraged that everyone else thinks they aren't giving enough, when that "everyone else" usually has no clue of how much they do.
Julie C.
6:50 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Could you please explain at what "level" Westford teachers are performing? How do you measure this level? By MCAS results or some other manner? If I understand your argument correctly, you are saying that pay scale should be tied to students' performance, i.e. since our town scores in the top 6.6% then teachers' pay should be in the top 6.6% as well. This makes no sense. So much more goes into how well students perform academically. It's not just the teachers. It includes the emphasis put on academic achievement supported in the household. Would Westford's teachers be able to get the same academic results from their students in a city like Lawrence or Lynn? I doubt it.
June Mary
11:49 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Local Yous stated "The calculation is rather complex, but it's called (link below) a “Salary Comfort Index” which takes into account cost of living. Massachusetts teacher’s as a group r number 34 out of 50. "
I went to the link and the web site called teacher's portal states that "the formula for computing Comfort Index is proprietary."
Can you use your superior negotiating skills and get the Comfort Index formula released?
Julie C.
7:54 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
One final comment @ Local regarding paying according to student performance...
The physical education teacher at my children's school is paid ~ $68K per year (according to the budget I found on the Westford school website.) How come my children aren't excellent athletes?
Local
5:57 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
So to recap, MA teachers are the best in the nation, they are compensated as though they are 34th, this in spite of requiring an even higher degree than 48 other states (counting D.C.) ask for. They are highly underpaid at an “interstate” level. Within the State you have a school district that puts you in the top 6.6%, a highly regarded school district that not only puts you in the top 6.6% for performance, but also efficiency with the taxpayer dollar yet they are paid as though they were top 40% They are highly underpaid at an “intrastate” level. I don’t blame them for feeling under appreciated and slighted in their treatment. So unbelievably under valued yet we have the nerve to call them greedy for wanting to maintain their under trajectory. I keep hearing a call for teachers to “rejoin” reality, well, I submit to you it is not the Westford teachers who aren’t living in reality, it’s the authors of these articles and the people denigrating the Westford School Staff for giving you the best performance in the country and wanting to remain as ridiculously underpaid as they are now. And enough with saying other districts have agreed to no step raises for this year without any context. I’m sure if you give the Westford teachers a $10k per year pay increase they would be glad to forgo their step raises for the year.
LC
8:11 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Local,
THANK YOU! Your facts, analysis, and just plain old common sense are right on. I appreciate the time and effort for you to not just state an opinion, but to research the facts and provide data to back up your assertions.
June Mary
10:43 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Or you can do a Donald or Mitt or Ronnie and say "You are fired."
One of the virtues of the capitalistic economic system is that "You can always vote with your shoes."
Please answer these two questions.
What is the average salary of teachers in Finland , Taiwan or South Korea?
What is the ranking of the US students in the PISA tests with respect to Finland, Taiwan or South Korea?
A logical person will come to the conclusion that Westford teachers are under performing and over paid.
June Mary
11:52 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
If the Westford teachers are the BEST in the nation, can you provide the sources to support your claims?
Can you provided the Patch readers the source of your Common Sense?
Local
5:58 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Links to back up everything above.
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/best-schools-in-boston/index.html
http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/state_report/teachersalaries.aspx?mode=&year=2010&orderBy=AVERAGE%20DESC
http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/state_report/ppx.aspx
http://www.teacherportal.com/teacher-salaries-by-state
http://www.uschamber.com/reportcard
http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-500172_162-10008953-52.html?tag=page;next
Local
7:54 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Julie, Boston Magazine posted their criteria, the others as well. If you can't see with all the math I posted above that they are underpaid and any budget problems are not the result of the school I can't help you. People (teachers are people too) are going to go where there talents are valued. "Better" schools, you can quantify that however you like. Lowell and Lawrence teachers who outperform aren't going to stay there if they aren't "treated" appropriately (treated encompasses many things) If Westford makes it clear they don't want 2 treat it's talent as well as other districts volunteer to, the talent goes elsewhere. U play the common sense card, and the naivety card when either suits you. I posted the math, the budgets, the ratings. You are confusing "demographics" and "socioeconomics." Since "asians" (I'm getting tired of using the word like this) are self taught, and families more invested Quincy and Lowell should be blowing other schools out of the water. Asian Populations significantly larger than anyone else but this isn't the case. Westford has a higher socioeconomic population which helps increase performance. But how you reason that "because we are wealthier and extract more from our teachers should be paid less" is beyond me. Socioeconomic draw applies 2 ur teachers 2. U can pay your way to lower caliber teachers & school system, the higher socioec population will follow the draw elsewhere until u have a Lowell and Lawrence. Nature abhors a vacuum.
Julie C.
9:26 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
I checked out Boston.com's state-wide average property tax amounts and Mass DOE's per pupil spending for classroom and specialist teachers. By town, I found the following:
TOWN / AVERAGE TAX BILL / PER PUPIL SPENDING (CLASSROOM & SPECIALIST TEACHERS)
Westford $6594 $4452
Acton $8767 $4541
Lexington $9584 $5869
Concord $10939 $6267
Newton $8320 $5908
Andover $7239 $5281
Bedford $6627 $6214
Burlington $4178 $6279
Chelmsford $5267 $4071
Harvard $8529 $4736
Groton $6371 $3971
Littleton $5415 $4443
How much more will our tax bills have to increase before teachers are happy with their salaries? When you compare Westford to Acton, Lexington, and Concord using average tax bills, Westford teachers are already getting a good chunk of our tax dollars. Keep increasing the taxes and residents will leave town simply because they can't afford to live here. And then who will be left for the teachers to teach? The union and the school committee need to come to a reasonable solution based on the tax dollars available.
Local
7:56 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Also, forgive the short hand text talk, character limitation is debilitating.
Randy Winslow
8:26 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
All well said.
Charlotte Radcliffe
9:41 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Part 1: Molly, it is very clear that you have made up your mind on what teachers are worth and not worth. Your opinions are not new and easily spewed by those who choose to remain ignorant as to what teachers do. I can extract from your rambling that you are unhappy with the entire philosophy of unions. As a successful and effective teacher, I am not in total disagreement. Problems that you allude to, mostly concerning, “protected bad teachers,” are issues that frustrate the good teachers too. These issues are well-publicized in headlines at the national level; and, it is all too easy to grab a pitchfork and march to the castle demanding the downfall of the union ogre. Please, take up your rhetoric and your opinions at the national level. It is a bandwagon that would no doubt welcome your involvement. What is clear is that you have no understanding of what is going on in the town of Westford. You look at the Westford teachers as the money-grubbing ogre fighting for an increase in wages trying to squeeze every last drop out of the town. This couldn’t be further from the truth...
Charlotte Radcliffe
9:42 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Part 2: Westford teachers are not at the table looking for more money. Emphatically, greed is not the motivation here. The intricacies and points of each proposal are not public, therefore, as can the teachers, the school committee is able to put a slant on information they post here and elsewhere. The town teachers aren’t even looking to catch up to the salaries of our colleagues in surrounding towns. Simply, we are resolved to reject an offer that allows the gap between our salaries and our counterparts to grow so wide that a $20,000 difference between a teacher in Littleton, Acton, or Chelmsford and a teacher in Westford will be common. According to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, the average teacher salary in Westford ranks far below the state average. In fact, Westford salaries rank 277 of the 323 reporting districts during the 2009-2010 school year. Counterparts with equal years of service in neighboring communities such as Acton, Chelmsford, Littleton, Lexington, Groton-Dunstable, and Lowell make a salary 4.5% higher, at a minimum. These facts become more eye opening when you consider that in 2009-2010, 97% of Westford 10th graders scored in the Advanced/Proficient Categories on the English Language Arts MCAS, 97% Advanced/Proficient on the Math, and 94% Advanced/Proficient on the Science. These percentages rank Westford above all of these surrounding towns....
Julie C.
10:08 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Just curious...does anyone know the average age of a teacher in Westford vs. these other communities? A community with young teachers on the lower end of the pay scale can skew the data...
AB
10:27 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Julie, WPS does tend to hire younger teachers more, which is why the starting levels are lower. It can definitely skew the data.
Want to talk fair? My Early Intervention teacher, in a field which boasts a success rate of $3 less in services required later for every dollar in services rendered now, has a master's degree in special education. She makes LESS than ONE FTE secretary in Westford. Our state leaders regularly cut services to special needs populations, and I don't see any teachers standing up at Beacon Hill crying for her master's degree being as fairly compensated as theirs are. She does her job because she loves what she does, and she knows she makes a difference.
June Mary
12:00 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Charlotte be careful in using the DESE average teacher salary figures since they do not take into account the step level (years of experience) in deriving the salary average.
For example, a school system with all of its teachers at the top 3 or 4 steps, which is 10 to 15 years after first year of employment as a teacher, will have a very high average salary. Another school system with higher salaries at each step but with all teachers at the bottom 3 or 4 steps of the step chart will have a lower average salary reported by DESE.
Charlotte Radcliffe
9:42 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Part 3: Geographically farther, but MCAS rank comparable districts, such as Concord-Carlisle, Dover-Sherborn, Andover, Wellesley, Weston, and Hopkinton have salaries 10-15% higher than Westford counterparts with the same years of service. This can amount to as much as a $14,000 difference for a teacher with the same years of experience. In 2010, The Boston Globe ranked Westford 6th in the state for ELA, 11th in the state for Math, and 9th in state in Science for tenth grade MCAS results out of 350 reporting districts. In 2011, The Boston Globe ranked Westford tenth graders 16th, 8th, and 10th respectively, in these same categories (286 reporting districts).
You also insinuated that the teachers wearing black are probably the ones who are bad teachers that “we should get rid of”. As with the private sector, there are different levels of talent in teaching. I can also tell you that in Westford, there is an extremely high bar to which a teacher must aspire to be considered worthy of working for the Westford Public Schools. The interview and evaluation process is rigorous. Those teachers wearing black are all considered highly-qualified with advanced degrees, years of service, and a genuine love for the profession. You are slinging at the teachers you think are the “wonderful ones.”
Julie C.
10:11 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
The towns mentioned here have real estate valuations and average tax bills far higher than Westford does. I live in Westford because it's where I can afford to live. Believe me, if I could afford to live in Concord, Carlisle, Dover, or Sherborn, I would be there!
Charlotte Radcliffe
9:43 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Part 4: You also mentioned the value of the parents to the Westford Public Schools. This is one point on which we agree. Working shoulder to shoulder, the highly qualified teachers and determined parents of this town have made this school district a model one. We—the parents, teachers, and administration—have high standards and working with the lowest per-pupil-expenditure of any town mentioned here, have maintained a reputation of excellence. Your children are hard working and well adjusted because of you and the good teachers they have had the opportunity to have. Make no mistake, it does take a village to raise a child and your child’s teachers are part of that village. One would be sadly misinformed to think that teachers do not play an integral role in raising a child as children spend ½ of their waking hours in school. There is a reason why Westford is a sought after community.
AB
10:13 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
It takes one or more involved, loving adults to raise a child. Judging from what I see of the rather apathetic, uninvolved, uninformed village, I'd rather it stay as far away from my children as possible.
My kids spend approximately 6 hours x 180 days in school, or 1080 hours per year. That leaves ~2200 waking hours at home the remaining 185 days per year, plus the other half day waking hours during the school year = 3280 waking hours per year spent at home. That must be some new, NEW math if time at school equals half of their waking hours.
You don't PARENT my children, you teach them. And some of you less effectively than others at that. It would behoove you to stop marginalizing my much more significant role as a parent if you want to stop being expected to "parent" your students. I don't want you parenting them, I want you TEACHING them. A job I could do just as well at home (and have) without your master's degree.
Charlotte Radcliffe
9:44 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Part 5: I didn’t get into teaching for the summers off, when I do work another job. I didn’t get into the profession for the salary that doesn’t come close to those with the same education level in the private sector. I didn’t get into teaching to deal with the opinions of folks like yourself who quite clearly don’t have the faintest idea of what it takes to be a teacher but can shamefully develop opinions just the same. I challenge you to spend a few days substituting in a classroom at any grade level and come away with the same attitude you have now. To that end, I would be happy to teach your children. Yours too, Heather. I became a teacher because someone clearly needs to show them the value and importance of a first class education, integrity, and that they should do their due diligence in research before developing ill-informed opinions based on assumptions. Finally, it is clear that only in school will your children learn to develop a well-worded, well-supported, fact based argument that is grammatically correct.
Regards.
*Facts and figures taken from the DESE website where MCAS results, district contracts, salary listings, and per-pupil-expenditure can all be verified.
Molly
12:17 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Lots of data and lots of charts and lots of rankings. Everyone can look at these things and see something different. First of all did not need the links was very well aware. I basically see that the teachers are not paid soooo less than all the other surrounding towns. So many factors skew the data as to why one town can pay teachers compared to another town. Population, property tax rating and younger teachers as Amber and others have mentioned. The bottom line in my OPINION is that the teachers here don't have it soooooo bad and feel they took a whiny approach to make their point. Teachers became teachers by their choice. Yes, very happy some of the great teachers that did make that choice but again noone twisted your arm to make that choice and if you do not like how it works QUIT! I know many of young people that have all their college debt and cant find a job right now and not making the money to match their college education either. Why do some teachers act like they are the only ones that are educated and not making enough money...It is called LIFE right now. The problem with some teachers and remember this they will never make enough money and noone will EVER treat them right. I guess I don't know what your looking for. I bet the teachers at those top pay scales complain in their towns tooo. I think the teachers of Westford had a great support system and yes not perfect kids but us parents have really helped those rankings too.
Jesse James
9:36 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Charlotte Radcliffe , you stated "I didn’t get into the profession for the salary that doesn’t come close to those with the same education level in the private sector. "
Teaching degrees are a dime a dozen. The private sector jobs, that pay over $100,000 after 10 years, require a Masters degree in a technical field and working 240 plus days a year with 50 to 60 hours/week with no overtime.
Charlotte Radcliffe , you stated "I didn’t get into teaching to deal with the opinions of folks like yourself who quite clearly don’t have the faintest idea of what it takes to be a teacher but can shamefully develop opinions just the same." The US and Massachusetts constitutions permit individuals to voice their opinions. The NEA and MTA only cares about the pay and benefits that can be squeezed from taxpayers. Listen to the words of the NEA's chief counsel at his farewell speech.
NEA General Counsel Bob Chanin Says Farewell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-piPkgAUo0w
Molly
12:41 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
As for the teachers wearing black, Yes I feel it is a direct slap in the face to the children you are teaching! To attempt to send a message about how poorly treated teachers are was a great lesson to teach all my kids of how not to behave and that behavior in a private sector job would not work. My kids who work know this. They respect where their paycheck comes from or they won't have a paycheck. Their choice!
As for me making up my mind what teachers are worth or not worth the teachers and their approach did that for me. I actually had a high regard for the teachers here in Westford as my kids have had great experiences. I actually thought the teachers here were not like alot of other ones, as soon things did not go their way wow. As for living a day as a teacher, anyone can say this try, flying all over the country!!! Try alot of other things. Really, goes to show you how out of touch to other people you are.
Molly
1:07 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Julie C thanks for the actual data. Comparing teacher salaries to other towns who have higher home valuation and property tax rates. Acton tax rate is 18.08. And they pay all the sport fees etc... Westford is a desirable place to live because we have managed to have great schools and keep the tax rate down as a whole for the town.
A good portion of the towns revenues are going to the schools. I think the school committee has tried really hard to preserve and grow and improve the schools and I am under the impression step increases are not guaranteed but negotiated. Angela Harkness and the rest of the school committee I believe are very dedicated to upholding the standards of Westford Schools. Look in Littleton they are in the same situation and they on average are paid higher than Westford a joke!
Dwight Tuna
5:28 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Molly, Why is higher paid Littleton Teachers a Joke? Oh thats right its a pathetic joke how Westford is so cheap. This also applies when it comes to Special education. Westford historically does everything possible not to let kids qualify for servies who would benefit from them because of COST. Ask a parent who had to get outside testing to get their kid on services. We have a much smaller % of kidson IEPS here and a big reason is cheapness. Now I understand being 'thrifty' is a positive but there is a line in which a school system is demaning dual county league results and only willing to pay Dracut/Ayer/Billerica funding...
Molly
1:34 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Charlotte as for not having a clue of what is going on in Westford couldn't be further from the truth. Very well aware of the goings on in my town. People can put alot of data out there and try to have everyone look at it a different way and great everyone is entitled to see it the way they want. But my opinion stands about the teachers approach to getting their point across. Very unprofessional and vey unbecoming. but the joys of being in a UNION! You don't look like you get alot of choice. As for being so Unified and ALL teachers are in agreement of this. How come at all the passing out of flyers I have only seen a handful of teachers. Westford has over 300 teachers employed. I bet there are alot of teachers who would love to get there step increase but may just understand they can't. What would happen if they spoke out about that? Can't imagine all the teachers associations would be too happy. Teachers have an important job, but there are alot of people in the world who have very important jobs. Any job that puts food on a table and a roof over their heads for a family is of importance. Charlotte look around there are other people in the world.... not just teachers....
Dwight Tuna
5:32 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Molly,
You said
bet there are alot of teachers who would love to get there step increase but may just understand they can't"
I REALLY dont think this is the case as the town is going to find out starting next week......Teachers are 95% together and unified and are UPSET at now only the financial 'offers' (taking away previously negotiatied pay) but also HOW we have been treated by a School Committee which lies lies lies to the public (for me this is much more insulting then the financial offers)
Andrew Sylvia
2:04 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Hi all,
Just a reminder, any comments that don't meet our terms of service (westford.patch.com/terms) may be removed at Patch's descretion, so please keep it as civil as possible.
Dianne R
8:09 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
I live in Westford, used to teach here and have taught in Harvard for the past 10 years. There is no comparison that although Westford is a great place to live teachers (in my experience) have been treated and payed significantly better in Harvard than Westford (I teach high school science). Its not only base pay but course reimbursement, stipends for curriculars, mentor program etc.
For the life of me with districts so close that are better for teachers I cant imagine now why younger teachers would stay in Westford and make $15,000 or more less than in a place like Harvard AND have to work for a superintendent and school committee that seems to be apathetic to their teachers.
Julie C.
8:54 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Once again, the average tax bill in Harvard is $8529 while the average tax bill in Westford is $6594, according to Boston.com's report on state-wide average tax bills. Harvard's total per pupil spending for 2010 is $13105 vs. Westford's $10697, according to the Mass. DOE website. Yet students in Westford performed better overall (all grades) on 2011 MCAS. Westford's ELA/Math scores were 90/86 Proficient and higher, while Harvard's were 88/79 Proficient and higher, again according to the Mass. DOE website. Teachers are free to follow the money, but the money doesn't appear to influence how well the students perform.
Anne Geary
9:29 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
There are going to be many more first year inexperienced (but perhaps wonderful) teachers in westford soon as many wonderful experienced veteran and younger teacher leave. Thats the reality. I hope administrators think about what they are going to say in an interview with a perspective candidate about how great the westford Schhol culture (used to be) is, and hello to working with no contract maybe for the next several years 0-0-0 when other towns are not doing this. Now ask yourself what first year teacher will pick westford if they have some job choices? not many. What you will get is teachers settling for Westford if thats the ONLY job they can get...I am sure the classrooms will be staffed with teachers but to think this isnt going to impact the kids in those classrooms is naive.
In the past 'weak teachers' were given a chance to improve or were quickly shown the door, that bar is going to have to be lowered a few notches if this isnt fixed soon
Molly
10:00 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
@Dwight. Littleton was just an example of higher paid teachers still not happy and in a similar situation. As for Westford being cheap on Special Education. That is a subject in itself. All I can say is that making that determination of who would BENEFIT and who REQUIRES them must be a very difficult decision due to the crazy crazy costs of testing and the services. A decision I am glad I do not have to make. My suggestion at this point to help those who need them would be to get rid of the perk of the teachers who live in different towns but their kids get to go to school here. I would love to know the numbers but to be adding 6594/pp expenditure and not paying Westford taxes and your right some WESTFORD child is now being cheaped on I have an issue with that. Let's just take those funds and help OUR kids!
@Dianne great happy you work in Harvard as I said in past threads if you can find a better gig Go! Can't compare town to town and what they are making as Julie said their average tax bill is way higher. Try being one of those 85FTE that Harvard hires. I can imagine not easy to get a job over there.
@Anne are you serious it is happening EVERYWHERE and it has been happening FOREVER!!! I remember being in high school and school cancelled because the teachers did not have a contract and they were picketing outside all the schools. I mean really! Again everyone trying to scare the parents and act like their kids education is going to down the tubes over this!!! It won't....
Local
2:06 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
Are you talking about open enrollment? That is available to anyone, anywhere in the state. It is not a teacher's perk, you have it too. The towns reimburse other "tuition" for each child. What that figure is I don't' know, maybe it is that you have exception with. If it is open enrollment you are talking about, I'm sure it benefits a number of teachers, for the same reason it benefits the regular public. It cuts down on child care costs for the parents and they will usually use it in relation to there place of work. They bring the child to and from school (one of the conditions of open enrollment, parents are responsible for getting the child to school) in the town they work in. The fact that it benefits a teacher perhaps more so than you is incidental. Also the cost per pupil to educate is not the same as they are not transporting the kid. (Unless of course you live in a town where you pay 100% of the kids transportation fees in addition to taxes, though I don't think that exists anywhere)
Jesse James
10:00 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Local, you stated " Are you talking about open enrollment? That is available to anyone, anywhere in the state. It is not a teacher's perk, you have it too. "
Once again, you are wrong. Westford does not get reimbursed for the children of Westford teachers attending Westford schools. including the 10+ students that reside in New Hampshire. In addition to not getting paid for the teacher kids, these kids go to the head of the line for open enrollment slots. A sweetheart deal similar to the Quinn Bill for policemen and Westford's special Quinn Bill like benefit for firemen.
It is time for teacher, policemen and firemen unions stop sucking the blood out of the taxpayers of Westford.
George Tattum
10:07 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Molly:
The thing I find interesting about Littleton (other than the teachers there are unhappy and working to rule like ours) is that they ARE being offered their steps AND a small COLA (Clost of living adjustment) which I think is .5% or 1% over 2 years.
Here we are offering NO Step this year and NO COLA. I dont think we would be in this mess if we could offer our teachers what Littleton is offering theirs. Too bad, I always thought we were 'better off' than Littleton and managed our funds better. Guess not.
Big Tuna
10:51 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
At this point I wouldn't trust Harkness if she told me the sky were blue!
Local
1:39 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
Pt 1
Mluther-
Local Yous stated "The calculation is rather complex, but it's called (link below) a “Salary Comfort Index” which takes into account cost of living. Massachusetts teacher’s as a group r number 34 out of 50. "I went to the link and the web site called teacher's portal states that "the formula for computing Comfort Index is proprietary."
Can you use your superior negotiating skills and get the Comfort Index formula released?
Me- I never said I was superior, but better to be that than sarcastic. With two clicks of my mouse though here it is "The Comfort Score examined average salaries (both starting and overall) and compared that to the cost of living. We then ranked each state by this metric to find which states were friendliest to teacher's - from a salary perspective."
Cost of living is a very complex calculation which I'm sure they pay a lot of money to obtain. They aren't going to give it away. Also why you are associating me or my argument with politicians is bewildering.
Jesse James
10:03 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Local, you stated "With two clicks of my mouse though here it is "The Comfort Score examined average salaries (both starting and overall) and compared that to the cost of living. We then ranked each state by this metric to find which states were friendliest to teacher's - from a salary perspective."
Are you delusional. I checked the site and the numbers do not add up. If you believe their claims, I have a bridge to sell you.
Local
1:52 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
pt2
MLuther - "Please answer these two questions. What is the average salary of teachers in Finland , Taiwan or South Korea?
What is the ranking of the US students in the PISA tests with respect to Finland, Taiwan or South Korea?
A logical person will come to the conclusion that Westford teachers are under performing and over paid."
Me - Those are both questions that if you really want the answer to you could probably dig them up.
If you want to compare wages, usually anything, the farther away you go the less relevant it becomes, depending on the type of data, it will usually be linear. There are also breaking points where data becomes very different and takes some heavy adjusting to bring it back. State lines, Country lines and Government lines are pretty good lines to keep with the data we are using. I compared Westford to the state, and the state to the country. If you want to do the calculations for all the different kinds of governments, (communist gov pay very differently than constitutional republics) cost of living, level of living etc feel free. The breaking point I chose is very reasonable and most importantly to me relevant.
Local
2:48 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
Amber Brown - "You don't PARENT my children, you teach them. It would behoove you to stop marginalizing my much more significant role as a parent if you want to stop being expected to "parent" your students. I don't want you parenting them, I want you TEACHING them. A job I could do just as well at home (and have) without your master's degree."
Me - Amber, if you are talking about me (because of the statistics) please understand I'm not a teacher. Part of what you said I applaud, the problem is not all parents realize their role, the teacher's role & that intersection. Also, the teachers did not ask to have extra degrees mandated on them. My point in bringing up the degrees is that it automatically increases the pay requirement. That is just fact. I also feel it unnecessary.
The parenting part I feel you r wrong on. I guess it depends on how u define parenting but a lot of things teachers deal with, through all grades is behavior problems. Young kids do a lot of silly things that need to be corrected, peeing their pants, stealing, hitting, arguing, disobeying the teacher, talking during class, spitting, throwing things, asking "parent" type questions. I would chalk that up to parenting stuff, not educational, yet it needs to be addressed. Many kids have behavior charts that monitor them daily. It might not be something u want or that your kid ever requires, but your kid requires the teacher address it in order to continue their education. Thats just how it i
Local
3:08 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
is. It's not a push and pull battle of teacher vs. parent. Some kids just require a lot of help with behavior, teachers don't get to just send them home. And they don't get to choose whether or not to do it as it affects the very well behaved children as well. Meaning they can't be teaching the children who are behaving at the moment when other kids are causing a disturbance. Behavior problems in general I think most people don't realize how much time and energy it takes up, before, during and after school. Managing 20 kids in an educational environment is not easy. I envy the summers off teachers have, but I don't think I could manage kids all day, the parent's of the children stuff at night and not die an early death or strangle someone myself. I've been managing people for work all my life and even 20 adults a lot....never mind kids. I think this is why they have summers off :^)
AB
4:42 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
@Local
I was addressing my comments in response to Charlotte's "it takes a village" comment as well as her uneducated remark that "children spend ½ of their waking hours in school."
First, as I said, they do not spend half their waking hours in school. Second, I don't view someone who repeatedly tells my child I am incorrect about a district policy she has not read and is unaware of and violating regularly to be part of the "team" raising my child. Not only do not all parents understand their role, but teachers and administrations fail to fall back into their roles as well, blurring the line between what SHOULD be parenting decisions and what should be administrative decisions. When public education administrators/educators are incapable of making adequate curriculum decisions or wellness policies which appropriately reflect state regulations, they probably should stay the hell away from the parenting decisions.
Addressing/correcting behavior problems is a part of educating young people, my teachers did it when I was in public school in a class of ~32 children (K-6th grade). They were paid proportionately less, yet achieved more as our standardized Iowa Basic scores were much higher overall than they are today (and teachers didn't have to teach to a test back then). If you don't want to correct childish behavior, don't work with children, politicians, people in an online forum. ;)
Patrick Tut
4:36 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
I wonder how long its going to be before high School coaches refuse to sign on for next year. I hope Dan T has a whole slew of backup coaches ready to 'call up' as well as new people who would be willing to run all those co curricular clubs that the NEASC so credited WA for running. I quite literally plan on 'taking my ball and going home' by finding another place to coach next year.
The town should be embarrassed at the likelihood of 150 WA teachers wearing bright yellow FAIR CONTRACT shirts to graduation this spring!
Molly
7:12 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
@Patrick, please take your ball and go home and good where your shirts for a fair contract...You will only embarass yourself and continue to give teachers the reputation they have as a very whiny part of our workforce and never happy!!! I bet if a survey was taken for a thousand people of all different careers most will say they are working for less, doing the job of 2 people because the company was cutting jobs, feel under appreciated, should be making more money......But they do not run around in yellow t-shirts throwing a temper tantrum!!!
Rich F
4:39 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Please let us know the actual results of your survey, not your speculation.
Molly
7:37 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
@Local was I was under the impression it was not open enrollment but a perk of being a teacher in Westford is they had the choice to go to school here. That is how it was presented to me by a teacher who was doing this. But maybe they left out details. An area that could use some details on....... If it is not open enrollment it may not be in the hundreds but some significant dollars that could make a difference, could save a few teachers jobs!!!
Local
2:47 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
No. It's open to everyone and you have to apply for it. So long as the schools have room it's usually not denied. I know a number of parents who do it but it's always a convenience thing not a performance thing. This article talks about it and the cap a little bit. But to the people saying they wish their kids could go to Harvard instead of Westford....they can. You just have to bring them (assuming you applied and they accepted) It just works out to be extra convenient for teachers it's just coincidental.
http://www.jstor.org/pss/1164403
AB
4:45 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
It is part of the teacher contract, though I'm not certain the put all the kids in as part of their "open enrollment" program, they should so the sending district can pay for them. I wouldn't take that as fact unless I saw the contract itself in writing. It certainly hasn't been true in years past.
Julie C.
8:10 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
This is the wording from the section of the contract that deals with children of teachers:
ARTICLE XIX NONRESIDENT TUITION
The Committee agrees to permit children of teachers non resident in Westford to attend
Westford Schools, provided that such attendance shall not require the Committee
(pursuant to its own policies) to increase staff, and provided further that, if such children
require special services under c. 766, the costs of such special services shall be paid by
the teacher/parent. The child of a staff member residing in Massachusetts who is seeking
entry in a grade that has declared openings under the School Choice program may be
admitted via the School Choice program. Acceptance in the School Choice program will
be subject to a lottery if there are more applicants than declared School Choice seats. If
the child of a staff member (who resides in Massachusetts) is not accepted via the School
Choice program, the child may still attend Westford schools tuition free. A child of a
staff member who resides outside of Massachusetts, who is not eligible to attend under
the School Choice program, will be allowed to attend Westford schools tuition free. The
Committee’s refusal to grant such permission in a given instance shall not be subject to
the grievance and arbitration provisions of the Agreement.
Molly
7:37 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
Correct- may not be hundreds of kids....
Derek
10:40 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
Wow. I've just spent the better part of an hour reading this thread. It leaves a couple impressions.
First, there is a lot of passion about this topic...go figure, it mixes lots of strong emotional triggers: people's wallets/pocket books, a sense of "fairness", some envy, some enmity, and the concern for the youth. I'd say "our youth," but I don't live in town yet (maybe one day after I retire from the service). I guess that passion is good, it certainly stirs up debate, and it's important to keep people involved in this process. But passion is also dangerous, in that it begins to lock people into their opinions and can turn neighbor against neighbor, with people saying things they might not mean to say in a civil society where we theoretically all have to get along. I think I see that beginning here, with a number of comments that becoming more and more vitriolic and personally insulting. That's a shame.....it takes away from the strength of one's argument.
Second, I remain amazed at how many people seem to feel that teachers "have it easy" and shouldn't complain about their lot. It was this feeling that drove my wife away from teaching after 13 years of teaching primarily special ed. After giving up countless evenings and weekends to help develop IEPs, teach parenting classes, grade assignments, build bulletin boards, etc., to come in to my office and hear the guy next to me joke about how no teacher should complain, since they get a 2 month vacation....
Derek
10:48 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
.....it was too much for her. When we got back to the states (she was teaching in DOD schools at the time), she went back to school and changed career fields completely. Funny thing, after 2 years in school, she took her Master's of Science degree and got a job, entry level, that almost doubled her salary from teaching....with no weekends, no early arrivals to prep, no late nights to finish things up. That was an eye opener for her.
Third, given the comments I've seen here, in public, I'm amazed that Westford is able to attract the top level talent it appears to have. There are a lot of emotions flying about, and a lot of ugliness showing through. I don't think I would want to come in to a town where people think the way I've seen above...especially, as others have mentioned, when there are neighboring towns with significantly different situations as regards valuation of teachers.
Fourth, to address something that keeps coming up, teachers are free to vote with their feet. True...but that also implies that there are positions for those teachers to go to. It's a bit ingenous....on both sides...to suggest that 1, large numbers of teachers will be leaving, and 2, that unhappy teachers should just go where the conditions are better. Both arguments depend on there being jobs available for those teachers to go to....as case I doubt exists in more than a small number of cases. And of course, it's easy to sit in Westford and gripe about conditions......
Derek
10:55 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
....it's a whole other thing to call it a day, seek out and accept a new job elsewhere, and then go there and start over. Not to say it won't happen...probably will in some cases, but the threshold of pain has to be high enough to overcome all that hassle.
So, okay....four comments...I guess that's enough from me....someone else's turn.
And before the arrows start coming my way for commenting on a town issue when I don't even live there....I know. But I did grow up in Westford, benefit from the school system (WA '88), and have parents still living in town...where I visit regularly with my wife and son. I hope to move back to Westford some day, so I think I have some small ground to stand on when I offer my opinions.
Oh, and for the record, I generally don't like unions, though I see the benefit of them. I do value teachers and the very hard job the do...teaching AND parenting as needed. I do think the teachers should have a contract, though I don't know if all their demands are reasonable, or unreasonable.
In the end, I think the town gets what the town is willing to pay for. And the teachers get the contract they are willing to agree to. If it means some of them lose their jobs so others get a step increase, well I guess that's what the collective decided was best.
Good luck to you all.....and I hope you can all talk to each other after this is all over.
Kathleen Spaeth
1:51 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Andrew, when I opened up my E-mail Inbox, this morning, there were over 60+ E-mails from this WestfordPatch article (just from this weekend). Yikes!
Why are Posters being allowed to post more than one comment a day? Also, some of the Posters re-posted their Comments continously (repeatedly) and that is very aggrevating and inconsiderate since your Comments duplicated in all our E-mail boxes and there is no way of knowing this until we opened each individual E-mail.
Also, what is with the Part 1 through Part 5 postings, too? One Posting per day should be enough and hopefully succient for you to express your opinion.
Yes, I realize that this is a very interesting, heated, and important topic (and has elicited a lot of discussion), but a little brevity would be good.
Finally, why are you still allowing Poster's to use Monikers (i.e.: Local) or Initials (i.e.: LC) when we are required to use our full names. I can understand just using your First Name or your Last Name, but not the Monikers or your Initials.
I will not be requesting that I receive E-mail updates to this article, since I can't have my E-mail box filled up (and overwhelmed) and will follow the discussion separately on my own now!
Andrew Sylvia
2:16 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Hi Kathleen,
I'll ask the technical support people on this one.
On the comments, I believe there is a word limit, and nobody's required to use full names -- originally that was the policy, but it's been relaxed over the past few months in an attempt to elicit more discussion. Now I generally err on not removing comments unless I and other Patch editorial staff believe a comment may be defamatory.
Julie C.
8:16 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
If anyone would like to read the teachers' contract, it can be found here:
http://www.westfordk12.us/pages/hrm/contract.pdf
Molly
9:16 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Julie, Thank you for clarifying the teachers children being able to attend Westford schools tuition free. I would say that is a huge perk and not sure of how many students there are but I bet it is quite a bit and a significant chunk of money.
Rich F
5:06 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Molly
9:16 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
"not sure of how many students there are but I bet it is quite a bit and a significant chunk of money."
You would bet based on what? Because is forwards your agenda? When you know the exact number of students and the financial impact please let us know. Enough speculation.
Local
9:50 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Molly,
It's evident to me now that you aren't interested in the truth of the matter, you want to state things in a way that casts Westford Teachers in a bad light.
Let me translate that article of the contract for you:
The Committee agrees to permit children of teachers non resident in Westford to attend Westford Schools, so long as it's not inconvenient for us. Also, We also do not have obey established laws regarding School Choice discrimination. If they have a disability, the parent is responsible to reimburse the school. The child of a staff member residing in Massachusetts who is seeking acceptance in grades where we have already declared openings will be paid for by the sending town under the tuition agreements. They may be turned down if they don't win a lottery spot in a contested grade. If they are turned down we may still choose to allow the child to attend at no cost to the parent (unless the child is dasabled) The town can still seek reimbursement from the sending town. Ultimately we can decide to turn the teacher down & they can't do anything about it.
Acton, Concord, Chelmsford, I looked at all surrounding towns I could think of and save Harvard and Groton, who have no such provision, and chelmsford who requires 50% reimbursement from the out of town teacher. The towns that have the same provision, did not have that disability clause that Westford does & did not say they would seek reimbursement from sending town.
Huge Perk?!?!?!
Julie C.
1:28 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Molly,
According to a report here on Patch from May 25, 2011, Mr. Olsen stated that the school choice program had 35 students last year and that the school choice program contributed $110K to the school budget from other towns to cover the students' tuition. The article doesn't say if all the school choice students are from outside of Westford; some might be going to a different school within Westford.
An article reported on Patch on June 7, 2011 stated that the max number of out-of-town students would be 22 for the 2011-2012 year. I did not see any mention of the financial impact...but it would be interesting to know. I'll keep trying to find that info somewhere!
Andrew Sylvia
3:25 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Hi Julie,
Just wanted to chime into this subthread,
The number for a cap on School Choice was updated in December
http://westford.patch.com/articles/school-choice-enrollment-cap-set
Local
10:38 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
So you do not know how many people are taking advantage of this "perk" yet you talk about the significant cost to the tax payer? The map shows Westford received 50-150 kids last year. If you want to keep talking about it you should find out how many of those kids were the child 1.) Of a teacher in Westford 2.) Were turned down by open enrollment 3.) Went w/o reimbursement from another town. That fact that they are tuition free does not mean they do not get reimbursent from the sending town. Teachers who live out of state would be the ones who would benefit but you don't even know how many it helps. The school district also gets to claim the child for state aid income.
You have no clue of the cost or how many people it affects.
Also, while looking through all the contracts I looked through, many towns will match teacher's contributions to a seperate retirement fund (not the pension) up to a certain amount, or they will contribute part of the required 11% of gross the teachers have to pay in to the pension (Westford teachers pay all of it) This is in addition to having non-resident child attendance policy similar to Westford in some areas. I invite you to compare the contracts (thank you to whoever provided that link) if you are interested in how they compare to other towns, just represent it accurately.
Local
11:43 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Westford has a reported 357 teachers. In 2007 MA averages are .88 children per family. Lets stipulate that every teacher in Westford is part of a "family" however they define that. Thats 315 kids.
1. How many are not residents of Westford
2. How many are school age
3. How many of what is left changed or enrolled into Westford schools?
4. How many of those kids went without tuition reimbursement from the sending town. Out of state teachers are the only ones we are sure would not be.
Keep in mind the turnover rate of Westford teachers is not high, so in general the subset of kids is pretty well established. It also requires that the teacher wants to change the school and as the child gets older that the child wants to as well. Also, tuition reimbursement per child is $5k per year under school choice program, so lets assume that on the losses it's $5k. And lastly Westford is home to Nashoba Valley Voc which is more heavily applied to than a regular school and is open for such, and most likely bears the brunt of that 50-150 figure of accepted kids. At this point all kids from Chelmsford, Groton, Pepperell, Littleton, Shirley and Townsend would be considered "In District" so you would lose from your figuring the Children of Westford school teachers who reside in these towns and attend Nashoba Tech.
Local
11:54 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
P.S. Links to all Teachers Contracts
http://educatorcontracts.doemass.org/contents.aspx
Joe smith
9:17 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Angela,
Whoever told you that all the unions agreed to this was misleading you, that is NOT the case. Jodi (town manager) and the selectmen are shifting the cost to the employees. The premium does go down slighty, however the co-pays will increase significantly. Westford employees already pay more for their health than any other town around them.
Vincent DiRico
7:46 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Welcome to reality, many in town have been dealing with issues like this for many years. Do you choose to just ignore reality? This is from another thread on this subject:
Vincent DiRico
7:24 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Dave, are you sure you know what is going on in the private sector? I work for the big blue company very close to Westford. When I had my children 9 years ago I used an HMO and loved it. Now the cost of an HMO is so high that I use a PPO. Back when the rates started to skyrocket (~ 7 years ago) the family rates were done away with, now you pay for yourself, your spouse and each child (no one gets a free ride).
Dave L
9:04 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Vincent, I am very familiar with what is going on in the private sector as I have spent my entire career there. I'm sorry if big blue does not offer a family package - my corporation does. In fact every corporation I have worked for in the past 10 years does. But this was not the point of my initial statement. My argument was that low co-pays do not tell the entire story. So to have people spout off about Westford employees paying lower co-pays than the private sector and therefore are receiving some huge benefit is irresponsible. You have to consider all factors, not just the ones that support your argument. Simply compare any of the plans (Employee, Family) to the comparable plans in the private sector and you may find that the premiums in Westford are higher. They certainly are in my case.
Julie C.
9:41 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Follow this link to see the Town of Westford Health Insurance Rates:
http://www.westfordma.gov/pages/government/towndepartments/WestfordMA_humanresources/documents/11-12%20Westford%20Health%20&%20Dental%20Insurance%20Rates.pdf
and a summary of what is covered under the Tufts Health Plans here:
http://www.westfordma.gov/pages/government/towndepartments/WestfordMA_humanresources/documents/Town%20of%20Westford%20-%20Benefit%20Comparison%20Summary.pdf
Easy enough to do a comparison compared to your own coverage. In my case, my family's premiums are lower but my out-of-pocket expenses are much higher. Obviously, the total cost depends on what health care services a family requires.
Rich F
10:43 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Julie C. wrote: "Easy enough to do a comparison compared to your own coverage. In my case, my family's premiums are lower"
Are you serious? You CAN NOT compare premiums between two health plans by just looking at the coverage. There are additional factors that go into the calculation of premium rates such as claims experience of the group, age/sex of the group, size of the group etc... The benefits offered by the plan are only one part of the premium.
The comments on this board by people that have absolutely no idea what they are talking about are ridiculous.
Julie C.
11:45 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Rich,
I'm not referring to how the insurance company calculates the premium it charges. I am merely comparing what the cost of each health care plan is to me as a consumer.
Rich F
1:01 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Julie - What do you mean when you say "costs"? Are you talking about co-pays, deductibles, employee contributions through paycheck deductions?
Julie C.
1:39 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
I'm talking about employee premiums, copays, and deductibles. For example, assume a hypothetical situation where a family has 10 doctor's office visits and 1 very costly hospital stay in a year.
One health plan, let's call it Plan #1, costs the family an annual premium of $5,000, the copay for an office visit is $20, and the plan covers 80% of all other medical expenses, but once the family reaches a maximum out-of-pocket expense of $1,500 the insurance company covers the rest in full. Using my hypothetical scenario, the family would pay $6,700 under Plan #1.
A second health plan, let's call it Plan #2, costs the family an annual premium of $6,500, the copay for an office visit is $5, and all other medical expenses are covered in full with no out-of-pocket deductible. Using my hypothetical scenario, the family would pay $6,550 under Plan #2.
So based on a family's medical requirements (which I realize you cannot always predict accurately) you can make a comparison between different health care plans to determine which is likely to save you money while providing the coverage you need.
Rich F
3:28 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Julie - I used your 10 office visits (sick visits since preventative care visits are free) and 1 hospital stay with an assumed cost of $5,000.00 and looked at the 3 Westford plans vs. the 2 plans offered by my private sector employer.
If I'm calculating this correctly, the cost of the Westford plans (Family) would be PPO $9,280.20, HMO $6,707.24, HMO Val $6,591.28, my employer's PPO $4,847.19, my employers HMO $4,215.40.
The biggest reason for the differences? My portion of the PPO premium is 20% while a Westford employee portion of their premium is 40%.
What does this show? 1) The Westford premiums are much higher than at the private sector company I am employed at and, 2) the Westford employees have to pay a much larger share, 40% vs. 20%.
Julie C.
3:50 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Yes, Rich, it appears that the health plan that your employer offers is significantly better than the one offered by the Town of Westford. The coverage for my family is much more in line with what the Town of Westford employees pay. Care to let everyone know who your employer is so that we can apply for jobs? Thanks! :)
Rich F
3:55 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Ha! I think if I put that in writing on here I'd be looking for a job pretty soon after!
Bonnie
11:24 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
I don't have all the details of the contracts and negotiations to date so I am not commenting on that. For those of us with only what we are seeing in flyers, newspaper articles and the Patch we don't have the entire story. I can say from my perspective that as a whole Westford's teachers are a group of talented, dedicated individuals who are willing to go the extra mile to challenge our students to realize their potential. Have I run into some Westford teachers who were not as good as the others? Absolutely - just as there are in every other profession and industry. Yes the teachers get the summers off. However that is taken into account with their salaries. Many teachers work summer jobs or part time jobs during the year to supplement their income. In addition many teachers buy classroom supplies out of their personal money to provide an environment conducive to learning. Look at comparable positions in other industries with similar education requirements. The salaries are not comparable. Yet these are the people who in partnership with the parents are teaching our future teachers, policemen, engineers, architects, mechanics, doctors and lawyers. I hope that this situation can be brought to a swift resolution balancing what is best for our students, our town and yes, our teachers. And no, I am not an educator but I do have respect for those who have chosen to do so.
John westley
7:37 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
As a Westford Resident and teacher in a neighboring town I can tell you I would be just as insulted as the teachers here if my previously negotiated steps were not honored. Its hard to explain to non teachers but these are 99% of the time (this seems to be the 1% because I had never heard of not honoring them before) an automatic. A cost of living increase is always up in the air and open to negotiation but I can say that TEACHERS in neighboring towns are looking at Westford with shock that this part of a contract was not honored here.
I cant think of a group of teachers who would lay down to be treated this way. Again people outside education only see 'raise' but this is specific 'raise' is SOP in the first dozen years on the job. After that new teachers are brought up to a competitive pay and no more steps. I support our teachers here in town and imagine this is going to go long and only get more ugly as I cant see teachers ever ratifying such an 'offer' from our town.
Paul
8:34 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
How is this insulting? The steps are not previously negotiated. The contract ended last June. They are negotiating steps, cola, working conditions, etc. now. The sooner the union realizes steps and or pulse pay (pay increase for having a pulse in the next school year) are not guaranteed the faster an agreement can be made. Five other unions realized this and have agreed. Why are the teachers different?
Vincent DiRico
8:57 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Well said Paul, CONTRACT EXPIRED and a dose of reality is needed!
Rich F
9:50 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Vinny, here is your dose of reality.
"The teachers' union has filed an unfair labor-practices complaint with the state Department of Labor Relations because the School Committee did not pay teachers step increases on Sept. 1 after the previous contract expired on Aug. 31.
The Department of Labor Relations is holding a probable-cause hearing on Wednesday.
The union contends that in the past, teachers were paid step increases even if the contract expired.
In a separate decision, the Department of Labor Relations recently ruled in favor of the Lunenburg teachers' union after it charged the Lunenburg School Committee with unfair labor practices for failing to pay step increases after the contract expired.
Westford Superintendent Everett "Bill" Olsen Jr. has said that step increases were budgeted for fiscal 2012.
The School Committee is waiting to move forward until the Department of Labor Relations issues its ruling on the step increases."
http://www.lowellsun.com/todaysheadlines/ci_19893079
Paul
12:03 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Rich,
The schools have not "always" been paid steps as new contracts were being negotiated. Lunenberg always did. That is a very big difference that the NLRB will be using as part of their decision. Again, why are we required to treat the teachers differently than police? Or the other unions that agreed to no steps in year 1? The union contract that just ended paid 3+% steps and healthy cola's during the worst economic crisis since the great depression. No one looked to renege on that agreement. Now your using the courts to force 3% raises following all that? Pretty incredible to me given the times we live in.
Vincent DiRico
12:20 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Rich F, I won't coment on all the other "day late $ shrot" respones you sprayed around this morning. (speling erors insertted for your readding pleassure).
Here: all I have to say is CONTRACT EXPIRED, save the little bits of respect and tolerance most citizens have left and live to fight another day.
Mluther
7:54 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Tea Party movement is sweeping into town and Jody and Angela are just the kind of people we need in charge right now. They are very Michelle Bachman like which I greatly admire!
AB
10:05 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Rich, numbers copy and pasted from mluther in another thread. I believe this provides a more complete picture, though it is still steps only.
Step FY2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY2011 3 Yr % Inc
1 $48,180 $50,767 $53,493 $56,382 17.02%
2 $49,490 $52,112 $54,873 $57,800 16.79%
3 $50,800 $53,457 $56,253 $59,216 16.57%
4 $52,110 $54,801 $57,631 $62,266 19.49%
5 $52,015 $56,143 $60,599 $64,136 23.30%
6 $55,834 $59,035 $62,420 $66,007 18.22%
7 $57,558 $60,808 $64,241 $67,878 17.93%
8 $59,286 $62,582 $66,061 $69,749 17.65%
9 $61,013 $64,356 $67,882 $73,031 19.70%
10 $61,527 $66,130 $71,077 $74,938 21.80%
11 $65,738 $69,242 $72,933 $76,847 16.90%
12 $67,497 $71,050 $74,790 $78,812 16.76%
13 $70,978 $72,859 $74,790 $78,812 11.04%
14 $72,794 $74,723 $76,703 $78,812 8.27%
Rich F
8:49 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
What is the complete picture you are attempting to provide?
Dave L
10:51 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Maybe it's how you cut and paste these but some of the numbers do not seem accurate. Best to go directly to the contract. Here is the website again. http://westfordk12.us/pages/hrm/contract.pdf
Derek
10:28 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
MLUTHER, I mean no offense, but I can't figure out if your comments here and on the BOS Letter discussion are meant seriously, sarcastically, or tongue-in-cheek. Please help me to decipher your actual stand on the topic of teacher salaries/contract and town finances. Thanks!----Derek
Andrew Sylvia
4:09 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Hi all, just deleted a few more comments with individuals calling others "a bad sardine" and a Spanish swear word.
This level of discussion is great, but the terms of service do not allow name calling. If the user would like to repost their comments, minus the name calling, that would be great.
And if I miss any here, let me know, I'll get to them as soon as I can.
Tony Martinez
5:06 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
I am glad good red blooded conservative Tea Party loving folks are in charge here in westford like Jodi Ross and Angela Harkness that are willing to go after liberals and unions. Teachers should be lucky they have a job in Westford and take whatever crumbs we are willing to throw them. We like to get a real value for our dollar here in westford and if we have to walk over the backs of the little guys who work for the town that so be it!
Do these teachers think the town is going to offer them anything next year when they negotiate contract again even if this is settled? Its going to be the same HOLD on STEP in year one all over again so better get used to it. We dont care about all those 'extras' you supposedly provide so work to rule to your hearts content and see if we care. Dont write letters of recommendation as there are too many kids in those liberal colleges anyway
Tony Martinez
5:10 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Also I think we should lay off the custodial staff and have teachers do the cleaning of their buildings between classes to save money...If we have to settle for 2nd rate teachers this is a small price to pay to clean house of those educated fancy book learning type educators the town has now
Julie C.
5:14 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
The kids at the Blanchard school already clean the cafeteria.
Tony Martinez
5:19 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Great, I would like the students AND teachers cleaning toilets and sinks as well. It doesnt save us real money unless we can reduce janitorial staff. (Unless we have the Janitors teach in the schools as they probably come cheaper and are just as good when it comes to playing movies and puzzles. A real inclusion model if I ever saw it